SUjagTILLiDIE
Well-Known Member
No, Chad was a assistant.Chad was su before he was no longer at su, so in theory, "su offered him".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, Chad was a assistant.Chad was su before he was no longer at su, so in theory, "su offered him".
No, Chad was a assistant.
Look at this ishtNo, Chad was a assistant.
So SU head coach allows his assistants to offer someone an athletic scholarship without seeing the prospective player film or a game? I would imagine the coach has to agree that the players his coaches are offering are worthy of a scholarship.
Look at this isht
No, Chad was a assistant.
Auburn's head coach didn't want Cam Newton....his assistant gave him a scholarship anyway....
Auburn's head coach didn't want Cam Newton....his assistant gave him a scholarship anyway....
I never heard this nor could I find anything online. Cam is different situations, he was 5 stars and was previously at a SEC school.
In Chizik’s book, All In, he says he didn’t want Cam Newton. He didn’t feel like bringing in a junior college transfer QB was the best thing for the program at the time, but Malzahn talked him into it.
http://heartofauburn.com/2014/08/if-he-hadnt-hired-gus-malzahn-gene-chizik-might-still-be-our-coach/
Yep Gus Malzahn was the person who pushed to bring Cam to Auburn. He also was a 4 star not a 5 star.
In Chizik’s book, All In, he says he didn’t want Cam Newton. He didn’t feel like bringing in a junior college transfer QB was the best thing for the program at the time, but Malzahn talked him into it.
http://heartofauburn.com/2014/08/if-he-hadnt-hired-gus-malzahn-gene-chizik-might-still-be-our-coach/
No he won't. Our backfield is just as crowded as y'all's, but if that excuse makes y'all feel better, then ok.You folks still arguing about the offers? SU offered both kids. But it was widely known that folks around the program wanted the both Lab kids. Meaning Williams that is going to LSU as well. We got the RB they wanted the most. I think we offered the Zachary kid too late. Chad was all over that kid and when he left it was over with. Looking at the fact Tillery and West return along with the West Point kid transferred in. The Curtis kid from JC, the other Curtis kid straight out of HS, Mims from Evangel plus the Lab kid. We got more than enough backs. Sullivan did the right thing going to JSU. He will get a chance to play right away. He wasn't going to have that opportunity at SU. Surprisingly Alcorn didn't offer him though. He's their type of back.
Yes, but perhaps it was Germany that was pushing hard for him while Odums and Berry may not have had him as high on their list. Different OCs have different preferences for their offense. Besides, I don't think anyone has said that the dude isn't good, just that having a dangerous QB back there with him helped him succeed at a high level. It's common sense that your offense is much more dangerous when the defense can't just key in on that one guy in the backfield.Chad was su before he was no longer at su, so in theory, "su offered him".
Talked into it or signed Cam anyway...regardless of what the head coach said?In Chizik’s book, All In, he says he didn’t want Cam Newton. He didn’t feel like bringing in a junior college transfer QB was the best thing for the program at the time, but Malzahn talked him into it.
http://heartofauburn.com/2014/08/if-he-hadnt-hired-gus-malzahn-gene-chizik-might-still-be-our-coach/
Why would we need to make an excuse? We are good at RB, and had no reason to go all out for to nab another one. Players make their decisions based on a lot of things, maybe Germany sold him the idea of being the perfect fit for his offensive style. Either way, who cares?No he won't. Our backfield is just as crowded as y'all's, but if that excuse makes y'all feel better, then ok.
Tillery is defintiely a great back, but he'll tell you himself that having other weapons on offense opens up more opportunities for big plays for him. If Tillery was our only weapon on offense, then folks would stack the box and key in on him, but because we have a great QB, WRs, and shifty Willie Quinn, defenses have to think about more things than just keying in on Tillery. So that statement you made doesn't stupid at all. Of course the Zachary RB was good, I don't think any on here has said that he wasn't.Tillery got all those career rushing yds because folks keyed in on Quinn.
See how stupid that sounds?
Of course the Zachary RB was good, I don't think any on here has said that he wasn't.