The problem, as I see it, is in the sentiment that the infrastructure being proposed by Obama is temporary. What he is proposing is maintainence that is long, long overdue, and that should occur on a basis a lot more frequently that it has been. ASCE (the American Society of Civil Engineers) has just put out its grades on the infrastucture systems in the US and most of them received D and D-minus.
The previous administration and others have been very laxed in providing monies, budgets, and thus jobs to handle this much needed work (that's why bridges are falling down, levies are failing, etc., etc.). This would provide sustainable jobs if the maintainence is done on the frequency that it should occur on. Even cites are doing a better job of this than the Feds and the State entities responsible for the major intrastructure systems finally targeted in OBama's Plan. I've seen (or it appears so anyway to be the case) people who make careers out of repaving the same stretch of street here in Cincy over and over again, keeping it maintained.
This is not a make work situation as Steele described; it is a case of the work necessary to keep the infrastructure systems properly maintained has not been occuring at the frequency needed to keep the systems adaquately sustained under previous administrations: and as a result, the jobs required to do so have been lost, creating an element of the strains that are cause of the problems with the current Economy.
Regards.