This thread has been a lot more interesting than I thought it would be. I think that the real question not whether the skills are better in one arena or the other. The differences in what we see on the field HBCU shows vs. DCI shows lie not in the capability of the musicians. Rather, it is in the DEMAND put on the performers.
The following are a few generalizations and not intended to put anyone into a box
- HBCU field drills typically do not include bands marching backwards, sideways, nor in obliques.
- HBCU field shows rarely feature instrumental soloing or ensemble presentations as part of a musical selection.
- HBCU dance troupes rarely do anything other than dance while the aux in DCI shows are required to perform multiple disciplines including dance.
- HBCU's typically do not have full percussion pits and mallet players featured in the shows.
This does not mean that HBCU's do not have the abilities or personnel to execute these. Quite to the contrary. We have plenty of people who can execute all of these. We simply do not demand it of them.
By the same token:
- DCI drills rarely show any symmetry between very first downbeat and the final chord.
- DCI's don't highstep. It is much more difficult to make highstepping look precise.
- DCI shows are really geared to peak for one competition: The DCI Finals. There are changes to every show for each of the preliminary competitions. A corps will typically play in 3 or 4 of these.
However, I think that the biggest difference between the two is who the target audience is. The DCI corps has target audience of about 10 judges. Half of those judges are in the stands and the other half of them are on the field with the band listening and observing at point blank range. The audience in the stands is close to 100% corps people who have similar but less developed expectations that the judges do. The target audience for the HBCU band is the other band, a smattering of band alumni (the two groups that actually care about the musicianship and precision), and 90% of the rest of the audience that wants to see and hear entertainment that they can get at a local club for a cover charge.
Someone made the point comparing the professionalism of an orchestra to a jazz band earlier. Both groups maybe professional but rarely would you find them on the same bill because the audiences are typically completely different. Bela Fleck and the Flecktones rendition of Beethoven's 9th would be very colorful, but the crowd at Philadelphia's symphony hall would not likely be impressed. By the same token, the Philadelphia Orchestra playing
Scratch & Sniff at The Quick would be just as colorful and met incredulously by the audience there. The two groups, highly professional and performing excellently, would be out of their leagues.
Now, I am going to make the same point that I have been making that I started when I was granted the privilege of speaking in a faculty meeting at Jackson State during the summer of 1981:
I appreciate the heart, soul, culture, heritage - the gamut that our HBCU institutions bring to the table. I shudder to thing where Blacks would be without them. However, for the sake of our institutions' continued existence, we cannot be content to compete with each other. As has always been the case in this country we have to be able to be the best at what we do AND at what those other schools do if we are going to give our graduates the opportunities to compete in the fields where were certify capable of competing with the best in the world. If we are not willing to do that, then we are lying to our graduates, we are lying to the world, and we will only certify our own self-destruction.