Alklan Braves You're on the Clock....
- Thread starter GoodFella
- Start date
- Status
str8brave
"Da Scorpio"
Now see, you read what I said in the previous posts so hard until you were not smart enough to get the "gist" of what I was saying......It had nothing to do with me being the missing piece to the band puzzle.....Go back and read...
Like I said I was not in the band those years that you all so-called "blowed" on the Sounds... when I was in the band...I didn't even know what a "M3, 4, 6, or whatever a UAPB was because you guys were not a factor in the equation of the SWAC powerbands..
I graduated before you guys even entered the SWAC.. and we were wreaking havoc back then. So, I can't argue because I was never in a band that faced the UAPB of today or so to speak of the yesteryears.., its pointless... You got it now... If you don't I will come back and break it down a bit simpler..Originally posted by str8brave
Now see, you read what I said in the previous posts so hard until you were not smart enough to get the "gist" of what I was saying......It had nothing to do with me being the missing piece to the band puzzle.....Go back and read...
Like I said I was not in the band those years that you all so-called "blowed" on the Sounds... when I was in the band...I didn't even know what a "M3, 4, 6, or whatever a UAPB was because you guys were not a factor in the equation of the SWAC powerbands..
Yeah that point would mean something if it was actually back in the day. Its 2003, alcorn is in the same boat as UAPB was back then, but that doesnt matter to me. PB is good and alcorn is not in 2003.....
str8brave
"Da Scorpio"
No, I would disagree with you on your first point...because Alcorn still has a "name"....UAPB never had a "name" until now....Now, whether Alcorn is living up to that name is the issue.....and they are not I agree....but what is purpose of addressing what happened last year..
The last statement is incorrect....I agree PB was good in 2002, and Alcorn was not living up to there name in 2002...not 2003.
The 2003 season has not come yet....you have to prove yourself every year...
Originally posted by str8brave
No, I would disagree with you on your first point...because Alcorn still has a "name"....UAPB never had a "name" until now....Now, whether Alcorn is living up to that name is the issue.....and they are not I agree....but what is purpose of addressing what last year..
The last statement is incorrect....I agree PB was good in 2002, and Alcorn was not living up to there name in 2002...not 2003.
The 2003 season has not come yet....you have to prove yourself every year...
Until I see alcorn this year, they are still sorry. What name does alcorn still have??
Re: Re: Re: Alklan Braves You're on the Clock....
Good fella what the h--- are you talking about, i haven't said a word. To be honest with we did get waxed last year, come on now everybody in the swac knows these. there is nothing else to be said about the truth,, the truthis the truth can't argue with that.Originally posted by GoodFella
Them last but whippings got you talking stupid Choppas....
i find it funny that the bluff has just gotten good these past couple of years and now they talkin like they got a long legacy or somethin..........yall still havent completely proved yourselvs yet get som more years under your belt before you start talkin bout servin people cause you have no idea what erry band in the swac is gonna have this year.....................except valley we know they gone suck...........:lmao: :lmao:
- Status