Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is why we need to cease the joint halftime performances. They are kicking us to sleep in the game. At least take the halftime. We are so gullible.I am willing to bet you they start the battle of the bands soon too. Watch what I tell you. You will see Stanford vs SU and Ohio St vs Famu at band battle's. It's coming like talking out the side of your neck.
Watch what happens though...
This basically guarantees that there may never be a MEAC Championship Game. The MEAC is just going to do like they did in the 90s and keep having these 3-5 team ties hoping one solid MEAC Team gets the FCS Bid so they can send another MEAC Team to win the Celebration Bowl.
Houston wanted to do a joint performance for halftime with us in 2008, but Mr.Jackson said heck no. lolThat is why we need to cease the joint halftime performances. They are kicking us to sleep in the game. At least take the halftime. We are so gullible.
I bet that Texas dude won't visit this topic. lolPo TP.....errrhhh I mean FCS Championship, Any Given Saturday and the right wing of meacfans.....smh & lol
That is why we need to cease the joint halftime performances. They are kicking us to sleep in the game. At least take the halftime. We are so gullible.
"Yall need to stop living in the past. It's a good way to bring about unity"
I bet that Texas dude won't visit this topic. lol
There's only one reason to change - if the NCAA/FCS powers think that by calling it a "bowl" will get the contest listed amongst the 'bowl listing' as was done in some publications for the Celebration Bowl. Not all publications listed the Celebration Bowl amongst their bowl listings, but a decent amount of publications and major web sites did - which at the time, I gave kudos to.
I disagree with any other reason for changing the name because at its core - it's a NCAA Division I Championship Game.
Should add that 75% of the respondents to ANY GIVEN SATURDAY unofficial surveying say NOT to change it.
"Yall need to stop living in the past. It's a good way to bring about unity"
So did USC at the first MLB Urban Invitational lol.Houston wanted to do a joint performance for halftime with us in 2008, but Mr.Jackson said heck no. lol
LMBO.....Surely you jest!
That is why we need to cease the joint halftime performances. They are kicking us to sleep in the game. At least take the halftime. We are so gullible.
So did USC at the first MLB Urban Invitational lol.
There's only one reason to change - if the NCAA/FCS powers think that by calling it a "bowl" will get the contest listed amongst the 'bowl listing' as was done in some publications for the Celebration Bowl. Not all publications listed the Celebration Bowl amongst their bowl listings, but a decent amount of publications and major web sites did - which at the time, I gave kudos to.
I disagree with any other reason for changing the name because at its core - it's a NCAA Division I Championship Game.
Should add that 75% of the respondents to ANY GIVEN SATURDAY unofficial surveying say NOT to change it.
That's what they said (on Facebook) when AAMU did the unity show with UAB. Can't remember the other school that did it recently but they said the same thing as well. Them folks were fire mad when folks said "we don't need to do joint shows with them".
I'd rather see AAMU do a joint show with Tuskegee or Miles than UAB or JSU and they wouldn't do it either lol
"Chevrolet Battle of the Bands," coming to a stadium near you featuring the NWST devils. smh
Lawd... smh