Folka
Playa
I see your point but I still don't like the SCG with the 9 game mandate. I never anything about the playoffs, you brought the playoffs up. Playoffs or no playoffs, muck the SCG.
So What Happens If/When The SCG Ends?
- Thread starter majiksity
- Start date
- Status
I see your point but I still don't like the SCG with the 9 game mandate. I never anything about the playoffs, you brought the playoffs up. Playoffs or no playoffs, muck the SCG.
Speaking of Braddy, he and his staff are total jokes who don't know how to coordinate events. Jackson has so many businesses that would love to be partner with JSU, but he hasn't marketed very well.
Supports give money to people in charge who have money. Nobody wants to give their money to a shaddy or questionable person. The best person to recruit business donors and money to JSU is right under their noses. EDDIE PAYTON. Eddie has a golf tournament during the Southern Heritage Classic in Memphis that bring out the major stars and major dollars for JSU. People, especially other race folk will give Eddie money because they know he has money and won't steal. You have to have money in order for others to give you money. Can I get a AMEN from anybody.
He should have been JSU's A.D. but the powers know that Eddie will get rid of the bullshatters.
:lecture::lecture::lecture:
Supports give money to people in charge who have money. Nobody wants to give their money to a shaddy or questionable person. The best person to recruit business donors and money to JSU is right under their noses. EDDIE PAYTON. Eddie has a golf tournament during the Southern Heritage Classic in Memphis that bring out the major stars and major dollars for JSU. People, especially other race folk will give Eddie money because they know he has money and won't steal. You have to have money in order for others to give you money. Can I get a AMEN from anybody.
He should have been JSU's A.D. but the powers know that Eddie will get rid of the bullshatters.
:lecture::lecture::lecture:
Last edited:
bernard
THEE Realist
No :noidea:
number1
Well-Known Member
I am still laughing at the quote in your signature.
bernard
THEE Realist
tomcat1, please change your screen name to dumbcat1 and crawl back into your douche bag. :sick: :retard: :noidea: :lol:
Yep...... no one is looking to raid the Swac of any schools
That goes both ways.....PV makes no extra money playing jsu in Texas and neither does Tx Southern.
These alledged three is carrying no one but themselves. I don't know why ya'll think that the conferance would wither away if you left. The football teams in the West will continue to be supportive of each other. Seems like jsu needs the western teams more than the western teams need jsu.....a lot more.....
MESSAGE ........
Tigerpride
THE Logical ONE
MD, I have always been a supporter of the SCG (maybe not for it to be in Bham) and also the Heritage Bowl.
Also, JSU has never lucked into a SCG. That would be AAMU. Now that the 9-game mandate is in effect, you can kiss Bham goodbye. If we always had this mandate, AAMU would have never to this day gone to Bham for the SCG and Hughes would have never been fired so we would have never heard of James Bell. Hughes was a victim of the 7-game format.
JSU, GSU, and SU will always have the advangate because we are in the Big 3. The rest of you have to beat at least two out of 3 of us to get to Bham. Whereas we only have to beat two of the Big 3.
Tigerpride
THE Logical ONE
No SWAC school has the resources to move up alone....and the hate from the schools that didn't move up would be un-real.
MikeBigg
Well-Known Member
Aint any of us financially or athletically ready to move up...
I think the SCG becomes a moot point and is potentially anti-climatic. But since it's in place...Grambling will continue to participate and win more championships.
In the meantime... I hope all of us sign up for some good regional FCS ooc matchups cuz there's plenty of them out there that might be good home and home attendance games.
Possible Home and Homes:
TxSU adds Texas State and Stephen F Austin
PV adds Sam Houston State and SF Austin
UAPB adds Univ Central Ark and Northwestern
Grambling adds Univ Central Ark and Northwestern
SU adds McNeese and Southeastern
JSU adds McNeese
MSVU adds Southeastern and Samford
Bama State adds Jacksonville
A&M adds Samford
Alcorn adds Southeastern and Nichols (Tad Gormley/New Orleans)
I think the SCG becomes a moot point and is potentially anti-climatic. But since it's in place...Grambling will continue to participate and win more championships.
In the meantime... I hope all of us sign up for some good regional FCS ooc matchups cuz there's plenty of them out there that might be good home and home attendance games.
Possible Home and Homes:
TxSU adds Texas State and Stephen F Austin
PV adds Sam Houston State and SF Austin
UAPB adds Univ Central Ark and Northwestern
Grambling adds Univ Central Ark and Northwestern
SU adds McNeese and Southeastern
JSU adds McNeese
MSVU adds Southeastern and Samford
Bama State adds Jacksonville
A&M adds Samford
Alcorn adds Southeastern and Nichols (Tad Gormley/New Orleans)
DAHILL
Well-Known Member
Why does everyone always include SAMFORD... their football program as of now is UNDER AAMU. Jacksonville State and UNA are above Samford.
MikeBigg
Well-Known Member
Actually, because I don't know any other FCS schools in Alabama... if there's someone else, that's cool. UNA is there...play them if it would be a better draw for your fans to come out.
MikeBigg
Well-Known Member
Even if it meant going to court... I had suggested this in prior years.
Tigerpride
THE Logical ONE
They are smarter than you think. In fact, when the NCAA denied 1-AA schools the chance to play a 12th game, they were VERY smart. It's simple math. If you give 1-A schools a 12th game, that a TOTAL of 110 extra games a year. Where are they going to get those 110 games from? ... 1-AA and lower tier FBS teams. Then who are we left to play? The solution to all of this would be to either eliminate the 12th game played by FBS teams or revert back to the old rule of not letting 1-AA schools count for Bowl eligibility. That would force more 1-A vs 1-A matchups and put us back to the time when we had no problem filling our schedule with 1-AA opponents.
DaHill,
I agree... honestly the OVC is not so far ahead of the SWAC in general. The Southland either. We suffer mainly from match-up problems. You can't put our 3-8 teams against their 8-3 teams.
Tigerpride
THE Logical ONE
MikeBigg
Well-Known Member
I think yall miss the reasoning behind my playing them...it's not that I think they are better, but I'm thinking in terms of revenue. Hopefully these regional matchups will spark fan interest and game attendance. In the case of Grambling, we're 73 miles from Natchitoches (Northwestern's home city) so it makes sense to see if we can create a matchup that fans would be interested in. Same with Central Arlkansas...about a 2 hour drive and Arkansas is a state that we recruit students from.
This creates a pool of schools for our home and home...(remember we have 3 neutral site games with Conference opponents so we need home games).
Arrange them so that we can have a nice home matchup package each season.
Year 1. Jackson, Northwestern, Valley, Bama State
Year 2. Alcorn, Central Ark, TxSU, A&M
Tigerpride
THE Logical ONE
I understand your point MikeBigg. That was the argument I made with Braddy about playing Delta State. Delta State only drew 12000 fans to Memorial but we don't get that many fans when AAMU comes to town. We don't have any 1-AA PWCs in MS but we have one of the top D2 programs in the nation in MS and I think we should open our season every year in Memorial against them.....and then go to Memphis. Delta State and TNState would be good games to prepare us for our SWAC schedule.
Why ask the NCAA to solve our problems when we can't do it with 11 games?
A 12th game is not the answer to our needs anyway. Getting the opportunity to play 3 OOC games would have been answered by a 8 mandate and not a 9 game mandate.
Playing the SCG is worthless and makes no sense.
Tigerpride
THE Logical ONE
2007 proved that the SCG has a place. It was re-match and the same team didn't win both games. In fact, JSU didn't play well vs gram the first time at all.
I don't agree with an 8 game mandate either...maybe if we had 12 teams but what is the sense in playing 8 out of 9 teams.
2007 proved that the SCG has a place. It was re-match and the same team didn't win both games. In fact, JSU didn't play well vs gram the first time at all.
I don't agree with an 8 game mandate either...maybe if we had 12 teams but what is the sense in playing 8 out of 9 teams.
2007 didn't prove anything..........
With 8 games you play the other 4 teams in your division and then 4 of the 5 in the other division with a rotation of 1 team off and on from the other division every year. Unlike what they have now where 2 teams rotate on and off every 2 years. With that you won't have to play a team from the opposite division as a OOC since you would only miss playing them 1 out of every 5 years.
Example:
Team 1's Schedule against the other division
2010 - Team A, B, C, D......Team E is out
2011 - Team B, C, D, E......Team A is out
2012 - Team C, D, E, A......Team B is out
2013 - Team D, E, A, B......Team C is out
2014 - Team E, A, B, C......Team D is out
With this there is no stress about anyone missing a "so called" money game for more than 1 year.
C-LeB28
Moderator
Playing devil's advocate:
If Prairie View won the 2009 SWAC West division, would you go the the SCG to root your Panthers on?
Again, remember the premise of my question.
Tigerpride
THE Logical ONE
I understood what you were saying without the example. I just don't see the sense in playing 8 games out of 9. You may as well play the other one.
...and yes, 2007 proved that the SCG is a worthy venture. 43000K fans where the underdog came out on top was a great thing.
- Status