(repeat post)
Dude, I already explained that to you, but you keep bringing it up like a broken robot. The Jazz were number 28, in the league in committing fouls. That's DEAD LAST. The Lakers were number three in the NBA in getting to the line....NUMBER THREE. That's like oil and water. The two don't mix, so when you get together a team that commits the most fouls versus a team who is almost number one in free throw attempts, you will get those kinds of stats. In addition to that, the Lakers were much quicker than the slower footed Jazz players.
The Utah coach all but admitted this, but you seem to ignore all of those facts just to try and prove your point.
The Jazz have been fouling ALL year, in the reular season and playoffs. It was nothing new, so why be surprised? On the other hand, what happened to the Lakers in Game 2 with the Celtics, was totally out of the ordinary. A top free throw shooting team only getting two first half free throws was totally out of the ordinary and highly suspect. Plus Boston is one of the most foul proned teams in the NBA like the Jazz.
I hope that ends this diatribe on this Jazz/Lakers dilemna you're trying to manufacture because it's nothing like Game 2 of Lakers/Celtics.
Last, but not least, you failed to mention that in game four of the Laker/Jazz series, the Jazz had 45 free throw shots, while the Lakers had only 25, in spite of their regular season history of being the most foul proned team in the entire NBA.
