JayRob
TigaPaw
1. No such thing as a "juiced ball." The baseballs were wound up more tighter which made the ball harder, and the seams on the ball lowered which made it difficult for pitchers to grip. Basically, the hitters were swatting large golf balls. The teams don't handle the balls during the games. The umpires inspect and rub up about 70 dozen ball a game. If the ball were juiced are altered, MLB would have to investigate itself and whoever does the maufacturing.
4. Baseball did not start testing for drugs until 2003 as part of a survey. Then it was found that 5 percent of players were on the stuff. 2004 that's when the official testing began.
Kenny, you just contradicted your own argument in the above statements.
Balls were not juiced but they were wound up tighter?
Who authorized it and why?
The MLB does not have to investigate itself. An independent source can be brought in to investigate baseball.
Second, since there were no steroid policies before 2004, how can baseball retroactively penalize Bonds for breaking a "policy" that wasn't even a policy at the time he allegedly took steroids? Legally, they can't, so it's a moot point.
Baseball's just hoping the federal government can do it's dirty work for it, then that'll give them an excuse to penalize the man.
This is the witch hunt of witch hunts in all of sports combined, plain and simple.