36-34
- Thread starter Dr. Sweet NUPE
- Start date
Jax
Chief Trolling offICEr
Re: But Guess what doe !
BUT GUESS WHAT DOE?????
2nd place FOR NOW!!!!
SEASON'S NOT OVER!!!!
IT AIN'T OVER YET!!!
SEASONS ARE NOT BASED UPON ONE GAME NOR ONE LOSS!!!
DANG Ya'll just don't get it!!!
AND GRUMBLIN IS STILL....
GARBAGE!!!!!
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
PS tell brooce brooce he'd better be going to classes...
Rumor has it the NCAA is investigating him missing reportedly 8(I think its more ) classes!!!!
BUT GUESS WHAT DOE?????
2nd place FOR NOW!!!!
SEASON'S NOT OVER!!!!
IT AIN'T OVER YET!!!
SEASONS ARE NOT BASED UPON ONE GAME NOR ONE LOSS!!!
DANG Ya'll just don't get it!!!
AND GRUMBLIN IS STILL....
GARBAGE!!!!!
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
PS tell brooce brooce he'd better be going to classes...
Rumor has it the NCAA is investigating him missing reportedly 8(I think its more ) classes!!!!
DonTiger
The One....The Only
Re: Re: But Guess what doe !
This is incredible. I mean this next statement... No SMACK intended...
Did an SU Faguar just say that "One game don't make a season"?
I am truely afraid of the Classic now man. I mean. If the Faguar Nation has finally figured out that ONE DAM_ GAME don't win you no title rings, they may actually be competative with the Chips on the Table at the Classic this year and not fold like they did in '01.
THEN ON 2nd THOUGHT.... This is SU we're talkin' 'bout. "Perenial 2nd place Brides Maids" And the Bayou Classic is their season so the losers are gonna find a way to lose to TxSU making the BC a meaningless game as usual. Tisk Tisk. And I had such high hopes for the undefeated Faguar nation too. Oh Well !!!! 4-Peat !
This is incredible. I mean this next statement... No SMACK intended...
Did an SU Faguar just say that "One game don't make a season"?
I am truely afraid of the Classic now man. I mean. If the Faguar Nation has finally figured out that ONE DAM_ GAME don't win you no title rings, they may actually be competative with the Chips on the Table at the Classic this year and not fold like they did in '01.
THEN ON 2nd THOUGHT.... This is SU we're talkin' 'bout. "Perenial 2nd place Brides Maids" And the Bayou Classic is their season so the losers are gonna find a way to lose to TxSU making the BC a meaningless game as usual. Tisk Tisk. And I had such high hopes for the undefeated Faguar nation too. Oh Well !!!! 4-Peat !
roadblock-2-spr97
New Member
But ya are "Blanch" ya are.
Jax
Chief Trolling offICEr
In conclusion
Ok this is the last one...I need to leave these so called grumblin fans alone. Relishing in someone elses defeat. But this is Grambling we are talking about. The EIGHT time disgraceful SWAC school NBC and the other 2.0 million viewers watch!!!
Icon status??? Gimme a break!!!
SU as bridesmaids?? I think the 9 times we've won the classic proves you WRONG. Also Pete has won 3 SWAC RINGS and 3 BLACK College National Titles. I GOT THE PROOF ON THIS ONE!!(Can't believe I'm stoopin to ya'lls level...nah never mind...too big for that)
From 1993 to 2002.: Black Collge National Champoins
1993
Southern (LA)
1994
Hampton (VA)
1995
Southern (LA)
1996
Jackson St. (MS)
1997
Southern (LA)
1998
Florida A&M
1999
North Carolina A&T
2000
Tuskegee (AL)
2001
Grambling St. (LA)
2002
Grambling St. (LA)
and...
SWAC Titles
1993 and back to back to back 97-99!!!!!
Look Don...its like this...
Winner takes all come 11-29. Be patient my young tigger fan...
Your day is coming...
Post all the accolades you want!!! B/C I know thats what you're gonna do. 11-29-03 will be an all out war. Hope you're ready.
I'm out!!!!
Until then TELL THE SWAC POWERS THAT BE TO rotate the SCG GAME!!!!
Ok this is the last one...I need to leave these so called grumblin fans alone. Relishing in someone elses defeat. But this is Grambling we are talking about. The EIGHT time disgraceful SWAC school NBC and the other 2.0 million viewers watch!!!
Icon status??? Gimme a break!!!
SU as bridesmaids?? I think the 9 times we've won the classic proves you WRONG. Also Pete has won 3 SWAC RINGS and 3 BLACK College National Titles. I GOT THE PROOF ON THIS ONE!!(Can't believe I'm stoopin to ya'lls level...nah never mind...too big for that)
From 1993 to 2002.: Black Collge National Champoins
1993
Southern (LA)
1994
Hampton (VA)
1995
Southern (LA)
1996
Jackson St. (MS)
1997
Southern (LA)
1998
Florida A&M
1999
North Carolina A&T
2000
Tuskegee (AL)
2001
Grambling St. (LA)
2002
Grambling St. (LA)
and...
SWAC Titles
1993 and back to back to back 97-99!!!!!
Look Don...its like this...
Winner takes all come 11-29. Be patient my young tigger fan...
Your day is coming...
Post all the accolades you want!!! B/C I know thats what you're gonna do. 11-29-03 will be an all out war. Hope you're ready.
I'm out!!!!
Until then TELL THE SWAC POWERS THAT BE TO rotate the SCG GAME!!!!
Dr. Sweet NUPE
New Member
Re: In conclusion
SU we not talking about Black College Footbal Champions....let's talk about SWAC Championships!!!!
SU we not talking about Black College Footbal Champions....let's talk about SWAC Championships!!!!
Man, you are Tigerpride-like. Do you have good understanding or not? A mofo tries to enlighten your dumb arse and LaCumba about the standings and the way things work in the SWAC and you come back with some siht like this. SAD. S. A. D. PERIOD. But ofcourse, you're a crab and you take everything on here as smack. Personally, I could care less if you loss to Alcorn. The West race was decided before the season started.
And about this being water under the bridge and it changes nothing, I tried to tell your silly arse that last week but I guess you just discovered that on your own. LOL.
And let me alert you to something. GRAMBLING DOES NOT HAVE TO WIN ANOTHER GAME before the classic in order to have a chance at making the SCG. Southern does. Not that I think they should have a problem beating Texas Southern but we're not the ones that need anything. We've already paved our way. You need to win. We don't.
MACHIAVELLI
Chairman/C.E.O.
Alcorn State
Rushing No Gain Loss Net TD Lg Avg
--------------------------------------------
LESTER,Robert 11 55 6 49 0 16 4.5
BURKS,Andrew 16 51 14 37 0 12 2.3
CARRIE,Donald 8 42 12 30 0 20 3.8
SPILLER,Charlie 1 9 0 9 0 9 9.0
WARREN,Chad 1 1 0 1 0 1 1.0
MCCOY,Jeremy 2 1 0 1 0 1 0.5
Totals... 39 159 32 127 0 20 3.3
Passing Att-Cmp-Int Yds TD Long Sack
--------------------------------------------
CARRIE,Donald 40-23-0 379 4 61 1
TEAM 1-0-0 0 0 0 0
HUGHES,Nate 1-0-0 0 0 0 0
Totals... 42-23-0 379 4 61 1
Receiving No. Yds TD Long
-----------------------------------
HUGHES,Nate 5 121 1 39
JOHNSON,Corvin 5 49 0 15
LESTER,Robert 4 48 0 16
CLARK,Kelvin 3 46 1 27
BURKS,Andrew 3 22 0 15
SPILLER,Charlie 2 85 2 61
WARREN,Chad 1 8 0 8
Totals... 23 379 4 61
Punting No. Yds Avg Long In20
-----------------------------------------
PHILLIPS,Shane 2 39 19.5 30 0
TEAM 1 18 18.0 18 0
Totals... 3 57 19.0 30 0
Punts Kickoffs Intercept
All Returns No.Yds.Lg No.Yds.Lg No.Yds.Lg
---------------------------------------------
TEAGLE,Lonnie 0 0 0 6 118 34 0 0 0
PARSONS,Tyrone 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 36 36
Totals... 0 0 0 6 118 34 1 36 36
Field goal attempts
----------------------------------------
MCCONNELL,David 2nd 13:10 23 yds - Good
MCCONNELL,David 3rd 10:05 22 yds - Good
MCCONNELL,David 4th 14:50 26 yds - Good
FUMBLES: Alcorn State-BURKS,Andrew 1-0. Southern-None.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Southern
Rushing No Gain Loss Net TD Lg Avg
--------------------------------------------
PEOPLES,Kenneth 18 104 3 101 1 25 5.6
RICHARD,Quincy 6 39 1 38 2 24 6.3
HOLMES,Gerald 5 28 0 28 0 13 5.6
MILLER,Leon 1 3 0 3 0 3 3.0
Totals... 30 174 4 170 3 25 5.7
Passing Att-Cmp-Int Yds TD Long Sack
--------------------------------------------
RICHARD,Quincy 34-18-1 194 1 40 0
Totals... 34-18-1 194 1 40 0
Receiving No. Yds TD Long
-----------------------------------
BRIDGES,Drayton 5 53 0 13
DAVIS,Chris 4 81 0 40
ARD,Alfred 2 25 0 23
JOSEPH,Lionel 2 14 1 11
PEOPLES,Kenneth 2 4 0 7
HOLMES,Gerald 2 2 0 4
NELSON,Adam 1 15 0 15
Totals... 18 194 1 40
Punting No. Yds Avg Long In20
-----------------------------------------
MILLER,Colby 3 104 34.7 38 1
Totals... 3 104 34.7 38 1
Punts Kickoffs Intercept
All Returns No.Yds.Lg No.Yds.Lg No.Yds.Lg
---------------------------------------------
HOLMES,Gerald 0 0 0 2 34 17 0 0 0
MOFFETT,Kevin 0 0 0 2 86 72 0 0 0
OVERSTREET,Anto 0 0 0 1 27 27 0 0 0
Totals... 0 0 0 5 147 72 0 0 0
Field goal attempts
----------------------------------------
ACKLEY,Montie 1st 08:24 42 yds - Good
ACKLEY,Montie 2nd 01:35 32 yds - Good
FUMBLES: Alcorn State-BURKS,Andrew 1-0. Southern-None.
FUMBLES: Alcorn State-BURKS,Andrew 1-0. Southern-None.
Rushing No Gain Loss Net TD Lg Avg
--------------------------------------------
LESTER,Robert 11 55 6 49 0 16 4.5
BURKS,Andrew 16 51 14 37 0 12 2.3
CARRIE,Donald 8 42 12 30 0 20 3.8
SPILLER,Charlie 1 9 0 9 0 9 9.0
WARREN,Chad 1 1 0 1 0 1 1.0
MCCOY,Jeremy 2 1 0 1 0 1 0.5
Totals... 39 159 32 127 0 20 3.3
Passing Att-Cmp-Int Yds TD Long Sack
--------------------------------------------
CARRIE,Donald 40-23-0 379 4 61 1
TEAM 1-0-0 0 0 0 0
HUGHES,Nate 1-0-0 0 0 0 0
Totals... 42-23-0 379 4 61 1
Receiving No. Yds TD Long
-----------------------------------
HUGHES,Nate 5 121 1 39
JOHNSON,Corvin 5 49 0 15
LESTER,Robert 4 48 0 16
CLARK,Kelvin 3 46 1 27
BURKS,Andrew 3 22 0 15
SPILLER,Charlie 2 85 2 61
WARREN,Chad 1 8 0 8
Totals... 23 379 4 61
Punting No. Yds Avg Long In20
-----------------------------------------
PHILLIPS,Shane 2 39 19.5 30 0
TEAM 1 18 18.0 18 0
Totals... 3 57 19.0 30 0
Punts Kickoffs Intercept
All Returns No.Yds.Lg No.Yds.Lg No.Yds.Lg
---------------------------------------------
TEAGLE,Lonnie 0 0 0 6 118 34 0 0 0
PARSONS,Tyrone 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 36 36
Totals... 0 0 0 6 118 34 1 36 36
Field goal attempts
----------------------------------------
MCCONNELL,David 2nd 13:10 23 yds - Good
MCCONNELL,David 3rd 10:05 22 yds - Good
MCCONNELL,David 4th 14:50 26 yds - Good
FUMBLES: Alcorn State-BURKS,Andrew 1-0. Southern-None.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Southern
Rushing No Gain Loss Net TD Lg Avg
--------------------------------------------
PEOPLES,Kenneth 18 104 3 101 1 25 5.6
RICHARD,Quincy 6 39 1 38 2 24 6.3
HOLMES,Gerald 5 28 0 28 0 13 5.6
MILLER,Leon 1 3 0 3 0 3 3.0
Totals... 30 174 4 170 3 25 5.7
Passing Att-Cmp-Int Yds TD Long Sack
--------------------------------------------
RICHARD,Quincy 34-18-1 194 1 40 0
Totals... 34-18-1 194 1 40 0
Receiving No. Yds TD Long
-----------------------------------
BRIDGES,Drayton 5 53 0 13
DAVIS,Chris 4 81 0 40
ARD,Alfred 2 25 0 23
JOSEPH,Lionel 2 14 1 11
PEOPLES,Kenneth 2 4 0 7
HOLMES,Gerald 2 2 0 4
NELSON,Adam 1 15 0 15
Totals... 18 194 1 40
Punting No. Yds Avg Long In20
-----------------------------------------
MILLER,Colby 3 104 34.7 38 1
Totals... 3 104 34.7 38 1
Punts Kickoffs Intercept
All Returns No.Yds.Lg No.Yds.Lg No.Yds.Lg
---------------------------------------------
HOLMES,Gerald 0 0 0 2 34 17 0 0 0
MOFFETT,Kevin 0 0 0 2 86 72 0 0 0
OVERSTREET,Anto 0 0 0 1 27 27 0 0 0
Totals... 0 0 0 5 147 72 0 0 0
Field goal attempts
----------------------------------------
ACKLEY,Montie 1st 08:24 42 yds - Good
ACKLEY,Montie 2nd 01:35 32 yds - Good
FUMBLES: Alcorn State-BURKS,Andrew 1-0. Southern-None.
FUMBLES: Alcorn State-BURKS,Andrew 1-0. Southern-None.
MikeBigg
Well-Known Member
Grambling and Tuskegee shared the 2000 BCF National Champ. Two recognized polls voted Grambling as #1 and 1 poll voting Tuskegee as #1.
Prior to the game I had mentioned that I observed a weakness in the jaguar defense. Especially the linebacker's problem with getting off the blocks to make tackles on straight ahead plays. Because the Braves ran effectively on 1st and 2nd down, they were able to execute on third and short. Those receivers were running free all night...it was a clinic.
Yall ought to be ashamed boasting about that weak azz no covering secondary. Them "GSU scout team caliber" receivers for the Braves made yall look __ __ __!!!
Prior to the game I had mentioned that I observed a weakness in the jaguar defense. Especially the linebacker's problem with getting off the blocks to make tackles on straight ahead plays. Because the Braves ran effectively on 1st and 2nd down, they were able to execute on third and short. Those receivers were running free all night...it was a clinic.
Yall ought to be ashamed boasting about that weak azz no covering secondary. Them "GSU scout team caliber" receivers for the Braves made yall look __ __ __!!!
No need to check my facts. I am right. You simply don't understand how things work in the SWAC divisional races.
And I guess I'd be standing right there with your dumb arse.
Would somebody from Southern (Bg, Tim, somebody) come and get this dude and explain the situation to him. Maybe then he will listen.
Name-calling is so . . . .childish
:lmao:
Tigerpride
THE Logical ONE
How dare you give this man the greatest compliment. I don't know if he is as good as me.
Jax
Chief Trolling offICEr
I see this is getting ridiculous. Name calling(on both parties), and all this back and forth is pointless.
So I'll just say this...Simply I DO understand how things work in the SWAC divisional race. You still gotta beat tSU. We must beat tSU and gram!!
Thats it! I'm gone...see ya'll in N.O. on 11/29!!!
No hard feelings, no harm intended.
(do not disturb!!!)
LaCumba
SAINT
MikeBigg, now LaCumba has never asked you to do anything before, until now. Please school your crab on how the west is won. I know he'll be a little embarrassed when the light finally comes on, but hell, losing on NBC all these years in front of millions and millions and millions of people should have given him ample time to put that "wanna get a way" grin on his face.
Would you explain to him that TSU is in the western division along with SU, PineBluff, GSU and PV? Would you explain to him that our lost to Alcorn has no baring on how the west is won, provided there is no tie-breaker? Would you explain to him that a loss to TSU this week would leave GSU in a "MUST" win in the BC once SU takes care of TSU? Would you please do that for LaCumba? I don't care how you do it. It can be publicly on the board or privately in your forum? It can be a phone call or a certified letter. You can ship the letter UPS or Federal Express, hell try Priority mail, it's a lot cheaper. I don't care how you do it, just do it. Stop him in his tracks. Stick a sock in his mouth. Post a picture of the tampon girls.... do something man. Don't leave him hanging like that.
DonTiger
The One....The Only
Let's get back to SMACK
OK,
I'll settle this in a simple way.
Let's look at the West Championship Scenrios.
But to preface. Both SU and TxSu have 1 SWAC loss. That loss will prevent either of you from winning the West when Grambling wins out regardless if that loss was from an eastern team. Certain eastern team games count in your SWAC standing regardless. Alcorn and J-State fell into that catagory for you guys.
NOW,
1) If Gram wins out, we win the West naturally. Beat SU and TxSU finish undefeated in conference.
2) If Southern beats TxSU and Grambling, Southern wins the West by virtue of the tie-breaker with Grambling. Head to Head comp. and TxSu has 2 losses
3) If TxSu beats Grambling and SOuthern, they win the West by virtue of the tie breaker with Grambling Head to Head comp and Southern has 2 losses.
4) Grambling is the only one of the 3 that could lose to one of the other schools and still win the West because we have no SWAC losses yet. A-Lose to TxSu, TxSu loses to Southern, we Beat Southern in the Classic, Grambling wins the West by virtue of the tie breaker with Southern. head to head comp and TxSU would have two SWAC losses. B-Lose to SU, SU loses to TxSU, we beat TxSu this weekend. Grambling wins the West by virtue of the tie-break with TxSu head to head comp. and SU would have two SWAC losses.
NOW IS THIS SETTLED? CAN WE GET BACK TO SMACK?
Gram 34 SU 17
OK,
I'll settle this in a simple way.
Let's look at the West Championship Scenrios.
But to preface. Both SU and TxSu have 1 SWAC loss. That loss will prevent either of you from winning the West when Grambling wins out regardless if that loss was from an eastern team. Certain eastern team games count in your SWAC standing regardless. Alcorn and J-State fell into that catagory for you guys.
NOW,
1) If Gram wins out, we win the West naturally. Beat SU and TxSU finish undefeated in conference.
2) If Southern beats TxSU and Grambling, Southern wins the West by virtue of the tie-breaker with Grambling. Head to Head comp. and TxSu has 2 losses
3) If TxSu beats Grambling and SOuthern, they win the West by virtue of the tie breaker with Grambling Head to Head comp and Southern has 2 losses.
4) Grambling is the only one of the 3 that could lose to one of the other schools and still win the West because we have no SWAC losses yet. A-Lose to TxSu, TxSu loses to Southern, we Beat Southern in the Classic, Grambling wins the West by virtue of the tie breaker with Southern. head to head comp and TxSU would have two SWAC losses. B-Lose to SU, SU loses to TxSU, we beat TxSu this weekend. Grambling wins the West by virtue of the tie-break with TxSu head to head comp. and SU would have two SWAC losses.
NOW IS THIS SETTLED? CAN WE GET BACK TO SMACK?
Gram 34 SU 17
MACK OF THE SWAC
New Member
Originally posted by LaCumba
Don't leave him hanging like that.
Originally posted by LaCumba
Please school your crab on how the west is won. I know he'll be a little embarrassed when the light finally comes on. . . Don't leave him hanging like that.
<snicker> <snicker>
The crab was right and the light finally came on for you. LOL. Wanna get away?
:lmao:
Oh, and give up on trying to divert attention from you being DEAD ASS WRONG. :lmao:
MACK OF THE SWAC
New Member
<h3>"Why Labamba Why?"</h3>
