Jax
Chief Trolling offICEr
IWJNSU said:Thanks for clearing it up for me. We are cool!!!!!!!
always...
:hat: :winkgrin:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
IWJNSU said:Thanks for clearing it up for me. We are cool!!!!!!!
SUGrad06 said:always...
:hat: :winkgrin:
IWJNSU said:Thanks for clearing it up for me. We are cool!!!!!!! STC60 missed his calling, he should be on BET's ComicView. :hat:
Tigerpride said:JRock, I think you have it all backwards. On paper, it appears that no team in the WEST can touch Grambling and on paper it appears that no team in EAST can touch Alabama State. But we all know what paper is good for.
EAST
1. Alabama State
2. Jackson State
3. Alcorn State
4. AAMU
5. MS Valley
WEST
1. Grambling State
2. Southern University
3. Texas Southern
4. Prairie View
5. Arkansas-Pine Bluff
Tigerpride said:I still stand by these predictions....the only difference is that AAMU might have moved up to to third place tie with Alcorn.
Jax1906 said:Negative...Remember back in 98(19-18). This time the game will not be decieded on a last minute play... Try this: SU 45 Alcorn 24
NOISE TALKA said:I predict that the season will start soon. lol.
Don't worry, I'm not here to dispute you, but what is your definition of "lack of offense" Journalist, and how is it AAMU fits into that definition?Journalist said:AAMU's lack of offense (ranked 63rd in I-AA in '03) period is truly unfair to its defense (ranked 1st in I-AA).
Mr. SWAC said:Don't worry, I'm not here to dispute you, but what is your definition of "lack of offense" Journalist, and how is it AAMU fits into that definition?
DAHILL said:The main objective in football is to score more points than the other team.... we averaged 34 points a game last year.... I could care less what number rank our offense was.... they did what they needed to do in most games. we scored 63 Texas So) points, 50 points twice (PV and UAPB), 49 points against JSU, and 40 points in 2 other games. We had a BALANCED offensive attack last year running and throwing for almost the exact same number of yards... we were not ONE dimensional... and we had THE BEST RUNNING BACK IN THE SWAC on our team.
I guess you don't know too much about the people we have returning. But I understand you thought process.Journalist said:Grambling's lack of a running game, which was partly to blame for McNeese having enough time last year to outscorse GSU 17-0 in the 4th quarter last season, will be that team's Achilles heel this season. Until someone else other than Bruce "The Big Show" Eugene proves they can tote the rock and make the defense honest, all they gonna see is a 4-man rush and 7 back in coverage.
Tigerpride said:...and you still...oh, this is the Sports Board..... :shh:
DAHILL said:and we STILL beat JSU to sleep.... Bonds ran for almost 200 on you... Your defense made Keith look like Michael Vick.... scored on a tight end draw where Jake Wilson knocked your defender a whole 5 yards backwards with one hit when he ran him over. Hell everybody scored that game lol....
Our OFFENSE and DEFENSE was better than JSU's.
SAME OLD G said:I guess you don't know too much about the people we have returning. But I understand you thought process.
Ok, I see. The glass is always half-empty with AAMU, ok, no need to explain further. This is where we say we were balanced:Journalist said:Now onto Bama A&M fan...(i'm about to rehash some things that drew y'all ire before, but it's true in some respects)
180 rushing ypg is great...but 180 passing ypg isn't...forget the spin y'all put about balanced..I've been following y'all since y'all joined the SWAC and um, y'all are STILL one-dimensional, but waaaaay on the other end of the spectrum from pass-happy Grambling... besides...who in the SWAC couldn't put points up on the teams y'all ran the score up on ...the reason I talked about your offense is that it's a liability in games when the opposing team's offense can put up points on your vaunted defense (read: blowout losses to GSU and Southern) or the game is ugly and the offense cannot consistently put scoring drives together (read: losses to Jacksonville St. and Alcorn St.) and BTW...y'all 8-4 record could've easily been 6-6 (read: MCC and Tenn St. game) Y'all can yap all you want about we scored 30 sumpin ppg or we had this and that...let's face it...the Bulldog defense set the table for that offense about 2/3 of the time (led the SWAC in takeaways)....the offense lived off the breaks the defense made much more than the offense made their own breaks
Heck, until it's proven otherwise, teams will continue just load up the box and dare y'all to throw. You have to admit, there's a sense no respect for y'all in passing situations or the skill players with the exception of the RBs.
Journalist said:Same Old G,
The reason why most of us really aren't familiar with the folk in the backfield coming back is, well, because of Bruce and the attention he demands and commands on the field. (Darn that Brad Hill for flunkin' out...that would've been a helluva one-two combo last season!) I'm highly curious to see if Spears is gonna incorporate the old "Coach Rob" Wing T..maybe update it a little to create mismatches for the passing game as well as a good way to pound it and give ol' Bruce a breather during drives...Hey, maybe Spears will follow the ol' Spurrier motif of the passing game setting up the running game, and vice versa...
Now onto Bama A&M fan...(i'm about to rehash some things that drew y'all ire before, but it's true in some respects)
180 rushing ypg is great...but 180 passing ypg isn't...forget the spin y'all put about balanced..I've been following y'all since y'all joined the SWAC and um, y'all are STILL one-dimensional, but waaaaay on the other end of the spectrum from pass-happy Grambling... besides...who in the SWAC couldn't put points up on the teams y'all ran the score up on ...the reason I talked about your offense is that it's a liability in games when the opposing team's offense can put up points on your vaunted defense (read: blowout losses to GSU and Southern) or the game is ugly and the offense cannot consistently put scoring drives together (read: losses to Jacksonville St. and Alcorn St.) and BTW...y'all 8-4 record could've easily been 6-6 (read: MCC and Tenn St. game) Y'all can yap all you want about we scored 30 sumpin ppg or we had this and that...let's face it...the Bulldog defense set the table for that offense about 2/3 of the time (led the SWAC in takeaways)....the offense lived off the breaks the defense made much more than the offense made their own breaks
Heck, until it's proven otherwise, teams will continue just load up the box and dare y'all to throw. You have to admit, there's a sense no respect for y'all in passing situations or the skill players with the exception of the RBs.
DAHILL said:you say we could easily been 6-6.... the Tn State game we led the entire game... when the second and third team came in that is when we had problems (dont know why they were left in so long)... We were winning 31-0... but you probably dont remember that. I can take a spin on what you said... We could have EASILY been 10-2.... fumbled snap on the 1 yard line late in the Jacksonville State game was a reason we lost that game..... We had the Alcorn game won UNTIL Keith got hurt and we lost that one by one touchdown. We dominated the MCC... but couldnt get in the endzone so we had to settle for about 4 field goals and STILL won. Our team wasnt mentaly prepared for SU.... Robinson played most of the game against GSU so there was no chance to win with him at qb.
Also why pass when we had the best running back in the league? Thats like Grambling running the whole game when they got Eugene at qb.