Bulldogs are right, they deserve a real dance card
- Thread starter MACHIAVELLI
- Start date
Normal1875
A&M #1
but what happened to your team? did they make it out of the SWAC tourney...who beat them?
DAHILL
Well-Known Member
JaguarNation99 said:
Damn an RPI.... that means that another SWAC team had a better schedule than us.... Of course our RPI wasnt going to be high we played two D2 schools (Tuskegee and Stillman) We won every SWAC tournament game by double digits, so i could care less about an RPI.
DAHILL
Well-Known Member
When has the SWAC ever been a force in basketball.... winning once game in the NCAA tournament doesnt make you a force. Times are different now.... the AAU game isnt letting any talent slip through the cracks anymore... AAU wasnt always as large as it is now... HBCU's were getting kids who slipped through cracks. AAU makes sure every player is seen now. If we get a good post man in this league... its because the majors have backed off of him because of grades. Sad but true.PsychoJag said:
Tigerpride
THE Logical ONE
Da_Sperm said:
I wish that we could get the SWAC to the point where we could get a NCAA bid and a NIT bid. I think that we might actually have a legit at upsetting some NIT teams.
MightyDog
Well-Known Member
I am no fan of the play-in game, but the play in game has been made attractive by perks. The perks that a team playing in the play-in game exceed the reason for establishing it in the first place. It was easy to take one of the two seeds that went to the MEAC and SWAC which have us competeing against each other rather than having the 65th team compete against the other seeds. But here is what was established to give the play-in game justification that makes it impossible to complain about it even those we lost a seed to get one more PWC in the big dance. In the history of the big dance no 16 seed team has ever beaten a #1 seed. Therefore the rules makers know what they are doing and justify the play-in game with RPI ratings.
Here are the Perks
1. Opening round of the NCAA Tournaments
2. Send a Charter Jet to pick you up
3. Pay all expenses for two days
4. A pay out of $150,000 to $200,000 up top of expenses.
5. TV Time which gives a small program air time that will help with recruiting.
Therefore the game will continue.
By winning the SWAC and The Tournament we had a very good year and we are proud to be a member of the SWAC. Maybe we did play poorly, but we accomplished some positive things this season. So look on the bright side of things; we can now boast about a SWAC Championship, but we don't have twenty because we have not been around as long as most of the old members. We are Bama North and looking toward our future.
Here are the Perks
1. Opening round of the NCAA Tournaments
2. Send a Charter Jet to pick you up
3. Pay all expenses for two days
4. A pay out of $150,000 to $200,000 up top of expenses.
5. TV Time which gives a small program air time that will help with recruiting.
Therefore the game will continue.
By winning the SWAC and The Tournament we had a very good year and we are proud to be a member of the SWAC. Maybe we did play poorly, but we accomplished some positive things this season. So look on the bright side of things; we can now boast about a SWAC Championship, but we don't have twenty because we have not been around as long as most of the old members. We are Bama North and looking toward our future.
Tigerpride
THE Logical ONE
DAHILL said:
We may not have been a force but a few years ago, we were not this bad.
Normal1875
A&M #1
Get Ready said:
how did yall white boy do against our jr high developed players last friday? you are from JSU not oakland right?..last friday A&M and JSU played! who was the cupcake in that game
jr high or jackson state?
Blacknbengal
Well-Known Member
Get it straight. We're talking about that horrible mess of an excuse that somebody called a basketball team getting drilled by Hammer's squad. This was worst than anything the SWAC had shown lately. And then you had YT laughing at you. Laughing at you..........on National TV. I dont think you are even deserving of being called Annie Mae, because she at least fought back.
Normal1875
A&M #1
Blacknbengal said:
who was on national tv last friday gettin laughed at? did A&M and JSU play on national TV? did JSU fight back .....
Tigerpride
THE Logical ONE
AAMU,
We are not really down on ya'll but the fact that our champ can't win a play in game....worst yet, get blown out in a play-in game. What JSU or any other team does not matter ....becasue yes, we all suck.....we we were not champions and we did not get whooped by a play-in team. Former SWAC Champions would have blown Oakland out.
We are not really down on ya'll but the fact that our champ can't win a play in game....worst yet, get blown out in a play-in game. What JSU or any other team does not matter ....becasue yes, we all suck.....we we were not champions and we did not get whooped by a play-in team. Former SWAC Champions would have blown Oakland out.
Tigerpride
THE Logical ONE
TRU3000 said:
Do you like Friday??? sheesh
Chris Tucker send help.
Normal1875
A&M #1
Tigerpride said:
could would shoulda ...WHY werent yall the SWAC champions this year? can you speak on that
Tigerpride
THE Logical ONE
DAHILL said:
uuum, they let you back in the game. They were kicking that azz by 21 points with like 5 minutes left.
mighty hornet said:
Conference winners should be subjected to play-in games if they don't have a winning record and their RPI's are not high. Didn't any SWAC school have a winning record. As it has been stated before "we just need to get better and then we don't have to worry about playing in a play-in game."
Tigerpride
THE Logical ONE
TRU3000 said:
Don't worry, you won't be SWAC champions next year. And yeah, I can speak on it...we are not SWAC Champs because we were sorry...just like AAMU.
