Young Black Republicans Speak Out!


This is a good documentary on what young black Republicans go through everyday. Hopefully, this will help some to better understand who we are and what we believe in.
 



So do these guys go to the backwoods in the south and rally with the southern base of the Republicans? Do they feel welcome?
 
ALPHA3 said:
:tup:

Royal Blue are you ready to talk about the economy?
Click to expand...

I will be more than happy to talk about the economy, but if we gone talk about it, then let's start at the beginning of this great nation and work our way forward to current day...........I'm ready.
 
ROYAL BLUE said:
This is a good documentary on what young black Republicans go through everyday. Hopefully, this will help some to better understand who we are and what we believe in.
Click to expand...

YOU are very different then the people in this video. I have no issue with Black Republicans YOU however are an extremist who can't hold a intelligent conversation without jumping off the deep end.
 



I think Royal Blue wants to sniff Obama's nuts. I mean this dude jocks him harder than the presidents wife does.
 
ROYAL BLUE said:
I will be more than happy to talk about the economy, but if we gone talk about it, then let's start at the beginning of this great nation and work our way forward to current day...........I'm ready.
Click to expand...

Cool, we can start with the failed economic policies(tax the poor and give tax breaks to the rich) of your hero GB. Do you agree he's to blame for this economic mess President Barrack Obama is fixing?
 
JSU*Toi said:
YOU are very different then the people in this video. I have no issue with Black Republicans YOU however are an extremist who can't hold a intelligent conversation without jumping off the deep end.
Click to expand...

All BS aside, I think you're confusing extreme people with those who are mentally and spiritually sound. I don't change what I believe just because mama and daddy say it's time for a change. I like to evaluate issues based on biblical principle, and others like to evaluate issues based on the mood of the world.............that doesn't make them an extremist.
 
ALPHA3 said:
Cool, we can start with the failed economic policies(tax the poor and give tax breaks to the rich) of your hero GB. Do you agree he's to blame for this economic mess President Barrack Obama is fixing?
Click to expand...

No, he's not to blame for the economic mess.......and before you can cure a problem, you must first identify what caused the problem. Have you identified what caused the problem? If the answer is yes, let's start with the housing crisis first, and give me a breakdown of the market and how it works.

Secondly, the last time I checked, poor folks don't give jobs to the jobless............the rich do. In fact, those on this board who work in the private industry would not have a job if it wasn't for the rich.


Also, I would like to know how taxes effect corporations and the the small business owners.
 
Last edited:
ROYAL BLUE said:
No, he's not to blame for the economic mess.......and before you can cure a problem, you must first identify what caused the problem. Have you identified what caused the problem? If the answer is yes, let's start with the housing crisis first, and give me a breakdown of the market and how it works.

Secondly, the last time I checked, poor folks don't give jobs to the jobless............the rich do. In fact, those on this board who work in the private industry would not have a job if it wasn't for the rich.


Also, I would like to know how taxes effect corporations and the the small business owners.
Click to expand...


RB you’re right. Bush can’t be totally blamed for the most resent economic down turn. However, Bush did help to make it worst. It was the Republican concept of deregulation or “Trickle Down” economics which created haves and have nots. We probably can go back to Eisenhower. We can throw Clinton in there too, because he like Obama felt he had to be more of a moderate in order to get elected. Clinton did a little deregulation also. The system works fine when resources are high and there is enough for everybody like how this country was started. But when your resources are low and only 1% of the population is controlling these resources “Trickle Drown” economic don’t work. That 1% of the population is going to do any under handed trick to stay in power, Like any other great empires or nations if you have less haves and more have nots, a revolt is going to happen. With a revolt there is instability and more problems.
 
Last edited:
ROYAL BLUE said:
No, he's not to blame for the economic mess.......and before you can cure a problem, you must first identify what caused the problem. Have you identified what caused the problem? If the answer is yes, let's start with the housing crisis first, and give me a breakdown of the market and how it works.

Secondly, the last time I checked, poor folks don't give jobs to the jobless............the rich do. In fact, those on this board who work in the private industry would not have a job if it wasn't for the rich.


Also, I would like to know how taxes effect corporations and the the small business owners.
Click to expand...

He may not be the cause, but the economic policy of the Bush administration sure didn’t stop it. The combination of tax cuts, expenditures for fighting two wars and his free-market thinking of a smaller government sure helped to put the country in a recession. Hell the last two years of his presidency can be associated with the subprime mortgage crisis which resulted in government intervention to bailout the banks and weaken the economy. Do you realize the U.S. national debt grew from 2001 to 2008? How do you justify spending $800 trillion dollars on a war? The increased spending for national defense, international affairs and homeland security due to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan all can account for a very large percent in the debt racked up by Congress and the President during both of his terms. Give me a break! Then you and others like yourself have the nerve to bash the economic actions of President Obama. Do you understand what a tax break is?
 
ALPHA3 said:
He may not be the cause, but the economic policy of the Bush administration sure didn’t stop it. The combination of tax cuts, expenditures for fighting two wars and his free-market thinking of a smaller government sure helped to put the country in a recession. Hell the last two years of his presidency can be associated with the subprime mortgage crisis which resulted in government intervention to bailout the banks and weaken the economy. Do you realize the U.S. national debt grew from 2001 to 2008? How do you justify spending $800 trillion dollars on a war? The increased spending for national defense, international affairs and homeland security due to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan all can account for a very large percent in the debt racked up by Congress and the President during both of his terms. Give me a break! Then you and others like yourself have the nerve to bash the economic actions of President Obama. Do you understand what a tax break is?
Click to expand...

$800 trillion with a T?
 
ALPHA3 said:
He may not be the cause, but the economic policy of the Bush administration sure didn’t stop it. The combination of tax cuts, expenditures for fighting two wars and his free-market thinking of a smaller government sure helped to put the country in a recession. Hell the last two years of his presidency can be associated with the subprime mortgage crisis which resulted in government intervention to bailout the banks and weaken the economy. Do you realize the U.S. national debt grew from 2001 to 2008? How do you justify spending $800 trillion dollars on a war? The increased spending for national defense, international affairs and homeland security due to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan all can account for a very large percent in the debt racked up by Congress and the President during both of his terms. Give me a break! Then you and others like yourself have the nerve to bash the economic actions of President Obama. Do you understand what a tax break is?
Click to expand...


Don't forget he never had or made plans to pay it back...but the republicans are fiscally responsible.
 
bigmanofds said:
RB you’re right. Bush can’t be totally blamed for the most resent economic down turn. However, Bush did help to make it worst. It was the Republican concept of deregulation or “Trickle Down” economics which created haves and have nots. We probably can go back to Eisenhower. We can throw Clinton in there too, because he like Obama felt he had to be more of a moderate in order to get elected. Clinton did a little deregulation also. The system works fine when resources are high and there is enough for everybody like how this country was started. But when your resources are low and only 1% of the population is controlling these resources “Trickle Drown” economic don’t work. That 1% of the population is going to do any under handed trick to stay in power, Like any other great empires or nations if you have less haves and more have nots, a revolt is going to happen. With a revolt there is instability and more problems.
Click to expand...

Yes, Bush did help to worsen the economic condition which was on a decline when he took over for Clinton............but most forget. Bush had no business signing that economic stimulus plan. As for the war, we all have our different opinions, but I did approve the war and the spending to protect this nation from all threats. Sometimes we forget what happened to Pearl Harbor, and that the Japs were in peace discussions with the US while secretly planning to attack Pearl Harbor. What was the lesson learned? Trust no nation!

If I were Bush, the first thing I would have imposed in this country was a mandatory law of a maximum 10% tax across the board. Why? If God can take care of the poor and educate school children with 10%, then the government can do it as well. The second thing I would have done was destroy the IRS, and give all tax responsibility to the States. The third thing I would have done was eradicate the education system, social security, medicaid, and encourage the poor to seek the church for help. This is why God implemented the 10% tithe or an offering, so the church can take care of the poor.........this also brought people who were non Christians to God; and this was also part of God's plan to bring His children closer to Him. On the other hand, the government has demanded more money than God, and God's people are depending and encouraging others to depend on the government instead of God. No where in the constitution or the bible does it say the government is responsible for feeding, providing, or educating people who live in this nation. The only thing the government is responsible for is making sure the rights of the people are upheld........that's all. The fourth law I would have passed would have given oil companies the right to drill in all safe locations, and I would have implemented an immediate plan to build 26 nuclear power plants across this nation.

What's happening in this country goes back to Woodrow Wilson in the year 1913. I'm going to place a quote from Wilson, and if people can comprehend, they will know a small group of men control the world. In other words, they control the stock market, the economy, and now they control GM in the form of a Union.

The Federal Reserve Act

"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country.
A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit.
Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation,
therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men.
We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely
controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world.
No longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by
conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by
the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men."

President Woodrow Wilson

http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/Woodrow.Wilson.Quote.51CE
 
Last edited:
ToPdOg said:
$800 trillion with a T?
Click to expand...

You mean $800 billion....


Secondly, we spend more money in purchasing oil from overseas, than we spend on the war. Why, when we got oil underneath our own ground, but the government has restricted companies from drilling?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top