Valley and Pine Bluff banned from basketball postseason play...


Status
Not open for further replies.

DAHILL

Well-Known Member
Jacksonville State men's basketball receives APR postseason ban
Published: Wednesday, June 20, 2012, 1:00 PM Updated: Wednesday, June 20, 2012, 1:06 PM

http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2012/06/jacksonville_state_mens_basket.html#incart_river_default

BIRMINGHAM, Alabama -- Jacksonville State received a postseason ban in men's basketball next season for low Academic Progress Rate scores, the second time one of its teams has been ruled ineligible due to academics.
In the NCAA's latest APR report released today, Jacksonville State scored an 889 in men's basketball and is ineligible for postseason play in 2012-13. The program also lost two scholarships and faces reductions in practice and playing time.
Three years ago, Jacksonville State's football team was banned from the Division I-AA playoffs. JSU football scored a 915 this time. Last year, the men's basketball program received a waiver from penalties but the NCAA ruled the school failed to satisfy conditions of that waiver.
Meanwhile, for the first time UAB had no teams below the APR standard score of 925. The Blazers joined Alabama, Auburn and most other schools throughout the state without any academic penalties.
Alabama football scored a 970 and men's basketball had a 984, both improvements from a year ago when football was at 963 and men's basketball 973. Three years ago, Alabama's men's basketball team was slightly below the 925 cutoff.
Auburn football had a 943 and men's basketball was at 925 this year, right at the current standard. Last year, Auburn was at 940 in football and 934 in men's basketball.
Besides Jacksonville State, the only other Alabama school penalized was Alabama State, which lost practice time in football (883 APR score) and men's basketball (820).
The APR awards two points each term to athletes who meet eligibility standards and remain at their school. The latest scores came from the 2007-08 to 2010-11 academic years.
Currently, the NCAA can impose historical penalties for scoring below 900 and immediate penalties for below 925. That's eventually changing to a single penalty structure with a benchmark of 930, which the NCAA claims equals a 50-percent graduation rate. The NCAA has given schools with limited resources more flexibility to meet the standards.
UAB men's basketball, which needed a waiver two years ago to stay eligible for the postseason, had a four-year score this time of 927. That's up from 860 last year, when UAB needed an unconditional waiver from the NCAA to avoid further penalties.
UAB's football program scored 953, which was up from 901 last year. The Blazers had previously ranked as the lowest in the Football Bowl Subdivision for three straight years.
Jacksonville State men's basketball is one of 15 teams ineligible for the postseason in 2012-13, up from eight a year ago. The only program from a major conference that is banned is the Connecticut men's basketball team.
North Carolina A&T State, Hampton and Texas Southern received bans in football. In men's basketball, California State-Bakersfield, Mississippi Valley State, Texas A&M-Corpus Christi, Towson, Arkansas-Pine Bluff, California-Riverside, North Carolina-Wilmington and Toledo are ineligible. Also, Central Connecticut State men's soccer and Northern Colorado wrestling can't participate in the postseason.
Samford scored a 976 in football and 1,000 in men's basketball. Troy was at 930 in football and 952 in men's basketball. Alabama A&M was at 937 in football and 902 in men's basketball. South Alabama scored a 916 in men's basketball.
 



WOW....so this is what Sean Woods did.

Also, I find it ironic how Wilson tried to diss JSU on academics and APR and went to Hampton only to get another ban. Sweet justice. :lol:
 
http://www.ncaa.org/wps/wcm/connect...June/Most+Division+I+teams+deliver+top+grades

Teams with penalties for 2012-13 season

There are 35 Division I teams facing penalties in 2012-13 for not meeting the mark academically. This means they posted an APR score below 900. The NCAA’s revised penalty structure has three levels, with penalties increasing in severity at each level. The specific penalties for each team are listed on their school’s penalty report in the APR searchable database.

Level One penalties focus on practice restrictions so teams can focus on academics. Teams facing this penalty lose four hours of practice time one day per week. That time must be replaced with academic activities. There are 26 teams this year with this level of penalty.

Level Two penalties include the Level One penalty, along with a reduction of four hours of practice time out of season replaced with academic activities. This level also includes the elimination of the nonchampionship season or spring football. Teams without a nonchampionship season face a reduced number of contests. There are no teams in this penalty category this year due to the transition from the prior penalty structure.

Level Three penalties include all Level One and Two penalties, plus a menu of potential additional penalties. These can include financial aid reductions; additional practice and contest restrictions; coach-specific penalties (including game and recruiting restrictions); restricted access to practice for incoming students who fall below certain academic standards; restricted membership; and potential multiyear bans on postseason competition. There are nine teams this year with this level of penalty.


Teams facing Level One APR penalties
•Alabama State University: men's basketball, football

•California State University, Bakersfield: men's basketball, men's golf
•Central Connecticut State University, men's soccer
•Chicago State University: men's track indoor, men's track outdoor
•Delaware State University: men's basketball
•Florida A&M University: women's volleyball
•Hampton University: football
•North Carolina Central University: men's cross country, men's track indoor, men's track outdoor
•Prairie View A&M University: football, men's track indoor, men's track outdoor
•South Carolina State University: men's track indoor
•Southern University: men's track indoor, men's track outdoor

•Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi: men's basketball
•Towson University: men's basketball
•University of Arkansas, Pine Bluff: men's basketball
•University of California, Riverside: men's basketball
•University of Connecticut: men's basketball
•University of North Carolina, Wilmington: men's basketball
•University of Northern Colorado: men's wrestling


Teams facing Level Three APR penalties
•Chicago State University: women's cross country
•Grambling State University: men's basketball
•Jacksonville State University: men's basketball
•Mississippi Valley State University: men's basketball
•North Carolina A&T State University: football
•Texas Southern University: football
•University of Louisiana at Monroe: men's basketball
•University of Maryland, Eastern Shore: men's basketball
•University of Toledo: men's basketball
 
Football
Level 1
Reduced practices
ASU
PV


Southern loses scholarships
TxSou

Southern loses scholarships in what? We just got cleared by the NCAA. Never mind. Tsugirl posted the link

Men's Track and Field (Indoor and Outdoor). Practice time reduction.
 
Last edited:
http://www.ncaa.org/wps/wcm/connect...June/Most+Division+I+teams+deliver+top+grades

Teams with penalties for 2012-13 season

There are 35 Division I teams facing penalties in 2012-13 for not meeting the mark academically. This means they posted an APR score below 900. The NCAA’s revised penalty structure has three levels, with penalties increasing in severity at each level. The specific penalties for each team are listed on their school’s penalty report in the APR searchable database.

Level One penalties focus on practice restrictions so teams can focus on academics. Teams facing this penalty lose four hours of practice time one day per week. That time must be replaced with academic activities. There are 26 teams this year with this level of penalty.

Level Two penalties include the Level One penalty, along with a reduction of four hours of practice time out of season replaced with academic activities. This level also includes the elimination of the nonchampionship season or spring football. Teams without a nonchampionship season face a reduced number of contests. There are no teams in this penalty category this year due to the transition from the prior penalty structure.

Level Three penalties include all Level One and Two penalties, plus a menu of potential additional penalties. These can include financial aid reductions; additional practice and contest restrictions; coach-specific penalties (including game and recruiting restrictions); restricted access to practice for incoming students who fall below certain academic standards; restricted membership; and potential multiyear bans on postseason competition. There are nine teams this year with this level of penalty.


Teams facing Level One APR penalties
•Alabama State University: men's basketball, football

•California State University, Bakersfield: men's basketball, men's golf
•Central Connecticut State University, men's soccer
•Chicago State University: men's track indoor, men's track outdoor
•Delaware State University: men's basketball
•Florida A&M University: women's volleyball
•Hampton University: football
•North Carolina Central University: men's cross country, men's track indoor, men's track outdoor
•Prairie View A&M University: football, men's track indoor, men's track outdoor
•South Carolina State University: men's track indoor
•Southern University: men's track indoor, men's track outdoor

•Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi: men's basketball
•Towson University: men's basketball
•University of Arkansas, Pine Bluff: men's basketball
•University of California, Riverside: men's basketball
•University of Connecticut: men's basketball
•University of North Carolina, Wilmington: men's basketball
•University of Northern Colorado: men's wrestling


Teams facing Level Three APR penalties
•Chicago State University: women's cross country
•Grambling State University: men's basketball
•Jacksonville State University: men's basketball
•Mississippi Valley State University: men's basketball
•North Carolina A&T State University: football
•Texas Southern University: football
•University of Louisiana at Monroe: men's basketball
•University of Maryland, Eastern Shore: men's basketball
•University of Toledo: men's basketball

For all those who laughed at JSU I do not feel sorry for u....But I do notice how alot of our HBCUs are affected by the APR we have got to clean up our APR and add more academic counselors in the Athletics Dept and Compliance Directors need to do their job.....
 
So PV fball, Hampton bball, UAPBbball, and AlaState (both) only got practice restrictions.

GSU bball, TxSo football, NCA&T football, and Valley bball have the heavy penalties.
 
I'm glad AlaState and PV and Grambling and TxSo got penalties. UAPB and Valley don't really matter one way or the other.
Kudos to the NCAA! I need PV and Grambling to get what they deserve since their football APR has always been worse than JSUs. Alabama State will be in trouble simply because they are ASU and the white folks have not taken over yet.
 



Maybe talking about in and outdoor track

Yeah our track program has suffered for a few years after losing our longtime legendary coach to illness. Brian Johnson is doing the best he can being such a young coach. Looks like practice hours lost and not scholarships loss.
 
Yeah our track program has suffered for a few years after losing our longtime legendary coach to illness. Brian Johnson is doing the best he can being such a young coach. Looks like practice hours lost and not scholarships loss.

Anytime u lose practice time and scholarships things will get bad but hopefully this will increase SU APR...I hope Mason and the AD have a plan of action..
 
Southern loses scholarships in what? We just got cleared by the NCAA. Never mind. Tsugirl posted the link

Men's Track and Field (Indoor and Outdoor). Practice time reduction.
On the NCAA website, it is showing the reductions for football. Maybe this report didn't take into account the recent waiver...


btw, TP,
Nothing much changed. You still won't be getting to the SCG.
:scared:
 
Anytime u lose practice time and scholarships things will get bad but hopefully this will increase SU APR...I hope Mason and the AD have a plan of action..

I am sure they do. I think the state of flux that the track program has been since the previous coach passed away has contributed. I don't know much the reduction in practice time is going to hurt the track team. Not like they have been setting the SWAC on fire. But our new AD is about the business and all the other sports tightened up. I think we will be fine. I am liking the direction of the new leadership at SU.
 
On the NCAA website, it is showing the reductions for football. Maybe this report didn't take into account the recent waiver...


btw, TP,
Nothing much changed. You still won't be getting to the SCG.
:scared:

Nah we good on football. The Advocate already had the article awhile back. AD got the official letter from the NCAA. It doesn't show us on the link that TSUGIRL posted. Which website are you looking at? Or what year?
 
I'm glad AlaState and PV and Grambling and TxSo got penalties. UAPB and Valley don't really matter one way or the other.
Kudos to the NCAA! I need PV and Grambling to get what they deserve since their football APR has always been worse than JSUs. Alabama State will be in trouble simply because they are ASU and the white folks have not taken over yet.

**** that...they voted against us. I need all of those dummies to get banned.
Now watch what happens at the next meeting. I assure you they will repeal the SCG ban.

This is the same NCAA sanction JSU faced last year right?
 
:emlaugh:

Now y'all know we are supposed to be feeling the pain with them and holding hands singing "We Shall Overcome"! :popcorn:
 
This is great fodder since the nat'l conv is right around the corner. :D cannot wait to burst the braggers bubble lol. 3 mens squads are inadequate.
 
**** that...they voted against us. I need all of those dummies to get banned.
Now watch what happens at the next meeting. I assure you they will repeal the SCG ban.

This is the same NCAA sanction JSU faced last year right?

Ban or no ban, they are not going to Bham. They need to pile on the bball and baseball penalties for them!

As for the no SCG ban, only TxSo will get that penalty but by the time we leave Texas, their season will be over anyway.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top