enswaclopedia,
I'm glad you got ALL of that off your chest (JR send help)
You said soo much, where do I begin.
First, let me say that your opinion of Jordan not being the greatest is definitely in the minority among sports fans, players, commentators. And if his career is based on marketing, explain how marketing got him not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, but SIX RINGS!!!!!!!!! And please, save that ole "he was protected" stuff by the refs. Thats one of the first things losers (or haters) start with------the refs. The guy was simply GREAT. He didn't play on great teams, he didn't have great teammates, but the results (individual and team) he got speak VOLUMES!!!!!! And let's see, the first title Jordan won, he won against the Lakers with Magic, Worthy, etc.
He (Jordan) twice beat the Jazz (who had 2 of the 50 all-time greats on their roster) in the finals.
Let's not even talk about the individual accomplishments. That would be too time consuming. LOL
Some of the stuff you say, I do agree with. like the league being watered down with a too many teams. But, I don't hear anybody knocking the accomplishments of the 60 Celtics when they were winning the league without a real salary cap in place, or even though players were not nearly as physically big in the 70s as today, Wilt Chamberlain isn't looked at in a lesser light. Since there were only a few teams with real chances to win in the 80's (Lakers, Celtics, Sixers), do we diminish the accomplishments of those teams?
Don't make me take you to CJ Dunn to school you on the finer points of the game!!!!