Dude we are not only arguing passing yds. JC's effeciency was just as good if not better than Luke's and JC threw more.Throwing more does not make you a better quarterback. Where are you getting this isht from? You had no running game. If you were in the red zone y'all threw a TD. If A&M was in the red zone, we ran for a TD. That's why JC has more TDs. He had 19 TDs on 342 attempts passing. Kelcy had 13 passing TDs on 277 attempts. That's a TD every 18 pass attempts for JC and a TD for every 23 pass attempts for Kelcy. He's not exactly killing him in this stat here. JC also had less INT's than Luke. JC had 7 INTs in 9 games, while Luke had 9 INTs in 12 games. The INTs have just as much to do with how many games you play in than just pass attempts. Kelcy had 2 more INTs over 3 games. JC could just as easily thrown 2 picks in that span of time. There are many teams that have 100-200 yds rushing every game and throw for 250-300 yds. Those teams that you are mentioning are not SU, and not only that, but usually don't have good defenses, but get caught up in shoot outs. Rushing is not a factor. If ya'll had a decent passing game ya'll prolly would have at least 1 SWAC title by now. I thought "the original conversation was about JC being a better QB than Luke"? How we get on championships now? Besides that, what makes A&M not have a decent passing game? I will mail you money if you can validly answer that question. If not, you are just talking out of your ass, AGAIN.