Swac Notes Week #1


Status
Not open for further replies.
All insults aside, this is a pretty good debate.

I agree with the A&M point of view because I agree with their overall offensive philosophy. A team should always make an honest attempt to be balanced on offense. (IMO, that means RUN the ball well first and foremost.) I you have bonafide fullbacks and tight ends and bother to use them, even better. If you can run the ball with authority, you'll eventually be able to pass the ball. It doesn't work the other way around.

I understand that teams have to do whatever it takes to win, but the right idea is the right idea. I don't think that Pete is doing J.C. Lewis any favors by becoming more and more one-dimensional. It's bound to hurt the kid and the team in the long run. I think SU is headed down the wrong path on offense. Again, that's just my opinion.
 
HBCUs said:
All insults aside, this is a pretty good debate.

I agree with the A&M point of view because I agree with their overall offensive philosophy. A team should always make an honest attempt to be balanced on offense. (IMO, that means RUN the ball well first and foremost.) I you have bonafide fullbacks and tight ends and bother to use them, even better. If you can run the ball with authority, you'll eventually be able to pass the ball. It doesn't work the other way around.

I understand that teams have to do whatever it takes to win, but the right idea is the right idea. I don't think that Pete is doing J.C. Lewis any favors by becoming more and more one-dimensional. It's bound to hurt the kid and the team in the long run. I think SU is headed down the wrong path on offense. Again, that's just my opinion.
Over the years SU has had a balanced offense. Last season because of a very young O-line we couldn't run the ball. During the BCC game, they stacked the line of scrimage. We could either run into an 8 man front or take what they gave us, the pass. Obviously we won so we did something correct. If any team in this league is one-dimensional its AAMU. You must don't keep up with the swac. If AAMU can't run, they are in serious trouble. Watch what happens saturday against Gram.
 



HBCUs said:
I don't think that Pete is doing J.C. Lewis any favors by becoming more and more one-dimensional. It's bound to hurt the kid and the team in the long run.
HBCU, I have to respectfully disagree here. Pete may hurt his team by being one-dimensional, but hurting J.C. is a stretch. Unless you're talking about hurting him physically by taking hits from defenders that's the only way. Cause the way I see it is the more J.C. passes the more he should learn how to read and dissect defensives. Now, of course that is only if he has someone who can help him also, cause if he doesnt then he will be in the same situation as Kent.
 
HBCUs said:
All insults aside, this is a pretty good debate.

I agree with the A&M point of view because I agree with their overall offensive philosophy. A team should always make an honest attempt to be balanced on offense. (IMO, that means RUN the ball well first and foremost.) I you have bonafide fullbacks and tight ends and bother to use them, even better. If you can run the ball with authority, you'll eventually be able to pass the ball. It doesn't work the other way around.

Good point, and basically the point that Mr. SWAC and Dahill was making.

That being said, the tight ends were used quite effectively last week. Ask TnSU. I'll bet they don't want to see #88 Charles Moody or #80 John Smith again anytime soon.
 
SUjagTILLiDIE said:
If AAMU can't run, they are in serious trouble. Watch what happens saturday against Gram.

...and what happens when you can't stop the run? YOU can tell us all about that based on what happened in Mudford last year.
 
SUjagTILLiDIE said:
If any team in this league is one-dimensional its AAMU. You must don't keep up with the swac. If AAMU can't run, they are in serious trouble. Watch what happens saturday against Gram.

You only get ONE DAYUM YARD rushing and WE'RE one-dimensional??? :xeye:

Sounds like you're the one who doesn't keep up with the SWAC. WHat did the stats show???
We CAN run (and did)!

The question is...can YOU? :smash:
 
Ntelekt said:
You only get ONE DAYUM YARD rushing and WE'RE one-dimensional??? :xeye:

Sounds like you're the one who doesn't keep up with the SWAC. WHat did the stats show???
We CAN run (and did)!

The question is...can YOU? :smash:
You can talk all that noise but we did what we had to do to win that game.
Over the course of time AAMU have been in the swac, who has had the better offense AAMU or SU. How many years has SU not been able to run the ball. 1 year ,last season, because of a very young O-line. Check the stats. How many Swac championships AAMU has in the trophy case. None, Nada despite featuring a good defense that often lead the conference. In 2003 we had a ok defense but an outstanding offense that won us the championship and put 55 points up on C&P.
 
SUjagTILLiDIE said:
Over the years SU has had a balanced offense. Last season because of a very young O-line we couldn't run the ball. During the BCC game, they stacked the line of scrimage. We could either run into an 8 man front or take what they gave us, the pass. Obviously we won so we did something correct. If any team in this league is one-dimensional its AAMU. You must don't keep up with the swac. If AAMU can't run, they are in serious trouble. Watch what happens saturday against Gram.

Please tell me how we are ONE dimensional when we had almost EXACTLY the same amount of passing yards as we had rushing yards last year... You do forget that Kelcey Luke had over 2000 yards passing last year, while AAMU had the top rushing offense last year... The more you talk, the more STUPID ish come out of your mouth.
 
DAHILL said:
Please tell me how we are ONE dimensional when we had almost EXACTLY the same amount of passing yards as we had rushing yards last year... You do forget that Kelcey Luke had over 2000 yards passing last year, while AAMU had the top rushing offense last year... The more you talk, the more STUPID ish come out of your mouth.
You have the nerve to call me stupid when you said Semoine Augustas was the 5th best women's player coming out of college. I guess she showed you. Wnba Rookie of the Year, Lead scoring in the all-star game, second in the league in scoring and All WNBA 1st team.:lol:
 
SUjagTILLiDIE said:
You have the nerve to call me stupid when you said Semoine Augustas was the 5th best women's player coming out of college. I guess she showed you. Wnba Rookie of the Year, Lead scoring in the all-star game, second in the league in scoring and All WNBA 1st team.:lol:

***** we talkin about FOOTBALL.... you the saddest ***** I know from SU besides Jag Br. .... we talking football and you divert to basketball.
 
SUjagTILLiDIE said:
You have the nerve to call me stupid when you said Semoine Augustas was the 5th best women's player coming out of college. I guess she showed you. Wnba Rookie of the Year, Lead scoring in the all-star game, second in the league in scoring and All WNBA 1st team.:lol:


Once again, you resort to your normal DIVERSION when your ignorance has been exposed.

How the hell do you go from the subject of this thread to the WNBA?


DIVERSION!
 
SUjagTILLiDIE said:
You can talk all that noise but we did what we had to do to win that game.
Over the course of time AAMU have been in the swac, who has had the better offense AAMU or SU. How many years has SU not been able to run the ball. 1 year ,last season, because of a very young O-line. Check the stats. How many Swac championships AAMU has in the trophy case. None, Nada despite featuring a good defense that often lead the conference. In 2003 we had a ok defense but an outstanding offense that won us the championship and put 55 points up on C&P.


Why are you babbling about years past, dude? :lol:
What will all of that stuff do to help you in the 2006 season??? :xeye:

Trophy-Smophy! We STILL tapped dat azz last year on y'alls Homecoming...better "Offense" or not! :D

You said that SU was unable to run only one year (last year), and last week y'all only got ONE yard rushing.
So with all that being said...why should I automatically believe that SU can run THIS year?

I mean, it makes no difference to me really, but you should be the LAST person talking about being one-dimensional right about now! :D
 
DAHILL said:
***** we talkin about FOOTBALL.... you the saddest ***** I know from SU besides Jag Br. .... we talking football and you divert to basketball.
Im just showing how you don't know what the hell you talking about. Im not diverting. Point blank AAMU offense traditionally sucks while your defense carries the team, and SU offense tradionally leads the conference, while we have an ok defense(1999-present after Vike and Yoshida). P.s. So you are admitting you were wrong about Semoine. :lol:
 
SUjagTILLiDIE said:
Im just showing how you don't know what the hell you talking about. Im not diverting. Point blank AAMU offense traditionally sucks while your offense carries the team, and SU offense tradionally leads the conference, while we have an ok defense(1999-present after Vike and Yoshida). P.s. So you are admitting you were wrong about Semoine. :lol:


You love to do this to yourself, don't you?

:smh:
 
Ntelekt said:
Why are you babbling about years past, dude? :lol:
What will all of that stuff do to help you in the 2006 season??? :xeye:

Trophy-Smophy! We STILL tapped dat azz last year on y'alls Homecoming...better "Offense" or not! :D

You said that SU was unable to run only one year (last year), and last week y'all only got ONE yard rushing.
So with all that being said...why should I automatically believe that SU can run THIS year?

I mean, it makes no difference to me really, but you should be the LAST person talking about being one-dimensional right about now! :D
SU can run you will soon see. It just didn't make any sense to run against an 8 man front. We gonna kick your arse in Oct. I see yall change the homecoming date away from the SU game. :swink:
 



SUjagTILLiDIE said:
SU can run you will soon see. It just didn't make any sense to run against an 8 man front. We gonna kick your arse in Oct. I see yall change the homecoming date away from the SU game. :swink:

You're right...it might not make sense to run against an 8 man front.
But considering that y'all couldn't run LAST year (albeit against an 8, 6, or 3 man front), I'm not convinced that this year will be any different. :wavey:

Show and prove, that's all....:headphone

Changed the date??? :xeye:

Stillman had been Homecoming opponent for the longest! :retard:
Now...WHO doesn't keep up with the SWAC again? :shh:
 
Ntelekt said:
You're right...it might not make sense to run against an 8 man front.
But considering that y'all couldn't run LAST year (albeit against an 8, 6, or 3 man front), I'm not convinced that this year will be any different. :wavey:

Show and prove, that's all....:headphone

Changed the date??? :xeye:

Stillman had been Homecoming opponent for the longest! :retard:
Now...WHO doesn't keep up with the SWAC again? :shh:
The last 3 times SU has been to Normal, SU has been yalls HC opponent.
 
AAMU Alum said:
Once again, you resort to your normal DIVERSION when your ignorance has been exposed.
This is ignorance.

DAHILL said:
Luke runs an offense that is BETTER than SU's ... so he would have to downgrade to run an SU offense as effectivly as JC.
:lol:
Mr. SWAC said:
:lol:
Mr. SWAC said:
Dude SU's offensive system doesn't call for the QB to do anything. All he has to do is make a read and time his passes. He's not asked to do much else. In AAMU's offense JC Lewis could only pass.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
SUjagTILLiDIE said:
It just didn't make any sense to run against an 8 man front.
I don't care if they had 12 men on the field and in a goal line formation. You ATTEMPTED to run the ball 20 times, and only gained 1 YARD.

YOU DO NOT HAVE A RUNNING GAME. YOU DO NOT HAVE A RUNNING GAME. YOU DO NOT HAVE A RUNNING GAME. YOU DO NOT HAVE A RUNNING GAME. YOU DO NOT HAVE A RUNNING GAME. YOU DO NOT HAVE A RUNNING GAME. YOU DO NOT HAVE A RUNNING GAME. YOU DO NOT HAVE A RUNNING GAME. YOU DO NOT HAVE A RUNNING GAME. YOU DO NOT HAVE A RUNNING GAME. YOU DO NOT HAVE A RUNNING GAME. YOU DO NOT HAVE A RUNNING GAME. YOU DO NOT HAVE A RUNNING GAME. YOU DO NOT HAVE A RUNNING GAME. YOU DO NOT HAVE A RUNNING GAME. YOU DO NOT HAVE A RUNNING GAME. YOU DO NOT HAVE A RUNNING GAME. YOU DO NOT HAVE A RUNNING GAME. YOU DO NOT HAVE A RUNNING GAME. YOU DO NOT HAVE A RUNNING GAME. YOU DO NOT HAVE A RUNNING GAME. YOU DO NOT HAVE A RUNNING GAME. YOU DO NOT HAVE A RUNNING GAME. YOU DO NOT HAVE A RUNNING GAME.
 
Mr. SWAC said:
Dude SU's offensive system doesn't call for the QB to do anything. All he has to do is make a read and time his passes. He's not asked to do much else. In AAMU's offense JC Lewis could only pass.


Im not even that dumb
beetlejuice_closeup.jpg
 
AAMU wanna talk about Diverting.....we went from talking about Luke not being a top 3 QB in the SWAC to running games, defense, and SU vs AAMU. Until AAMU wins a Championship all of this debate is moot anyway. :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
 
PsychoJag said:
AAMU wanna talk about Diverting.....we went from talking about Luke not being a top 3 QB in the SWAC to running games, defense, and SU vs AAMU. Until AAMU wins a Championship all of this debate is moot anyway. :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

Us not having a championship didn't stop us from embarassing y'all on your homecoming, now did it? :bump:

And he wants to talk about what's moot...:lol: :smh:
 
SUjagTILLiDIE said:
The last 3 times SU has been to Normal, SU has been yalls HC opponent.
SU has been our homecoming opponent only twice in history. '98 and '04. In 2000 you were a regular season opponent, in 2002 we took you to Indy for an ass whoopin' on national tv, and this year y'all are coming back to another ass whoopin' by the hands of the Bulldogs.



Find your own material to smack with chump:smug2:

Blacknbengal said:
HBCU, I have to respectfully disagree here. Pete may hurt his team by being one-dimensional, but hurting J.C. is a stretch. Unless you're talking about hurting him physically by taking hits from defenders that's the only way. Cause the way I see it is the more J.C. passes the more he should learn how to read and dissect defensives. Now, of course that is only if he has someone who can help him also, cause if he doesnt then he will be in the same situation as Kent.
This is why I say you don't know football.
 
Ntelekt said:
Us not having a championship didn't stop us from embarassing y'all on your homecoming, now did it? :bump:

And he wants to talk about what's moot...:lol: :smh:

I guess ya'll had to return the favor from us REALLY stomping ya'll arses at ya'll homecoming, but I guess that's what they mean when they say that to some, beating SU is better than a Championship. :swink:


P.S. Who's The 1-AA Player of the week again????
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top