Pacman vs Bradley who yall got?


SUjagTILLiDIE said:
alot of those rounds Pac aint do much until the end. You cant let the crowd and the commentators tell you who won, but i did fell pac won lol.
Click to expand...

Had nothing to do with the crowd or commentators. Pac simply landed the more effective, more consequential punches round after round. I agree that Pac coasted through the last three rounds, and his recent inability to finish fights strong was bound to catch up at him at some point.
 



PsychoJag said:
Compubox didnt agree. Hell I don't even think Bradley believed. :lol:
Click to expand...


That's your opinion. The record book gonna say Bradley and that is the correct call. Pac Mnan aint dont shit but threw tons of punches that caught leather. Bradley never seem to stop what he was doing from the start. PacMan never eve had him in trouble. He hurt him once and Bradley kept punches Pac Man mouth was a bloody mess from catching glove.
 
CATMENDUE2 said:
That's your opinion. The record book gonna say Bradley and that is the correct call. Pac Mnan aint dont shit but threw tons of punches that caught leather. Bradley never seem to stop what he was doing from the start. PacMan never eve had him in trouble. He hurt him once and Bradley kept punches Pac Man mouth was a bloody mess from catching glove.
Click to expand...

Wow pacman bit his tongue dude. You're reaching big time. :lol:
 
PsychoJag said:
Pacquiao landed 253 of 751 punches, a connect rate of 34 percent. Bradley landed 159 of 839, a connect rate of just 19 percent.
Click to expand...

CATMENDUE2 said:
Thats cause Pacman threw 200 less punches.
Click to expand...

Dude, that's only 88 fewer punches! 839-751= 88 not 200!

I watched this fight from beginning to end and there is no way Bradley had that fight won. Pacquiao was sticking Bradley the entire match. There was one round where they did a punch count and so far in that round Bradley had only thrown 9 punches! 9 dayum punches?!?! Come on man.

With the way boxing is going, I wouldn't be surprised if Vince McMahon came out to the ring one day soon and said that he's the man behind boxing. I have more respect for professional wrestling than I do for boxing right now.
 
CATMENDUE2 said:
Bradley won that fight. Pac Man tried to use a strategy that didnot work. You can't win a round with 3 punches the last 30 second and expect any judge to give you the fight. Bradley corner had him ahead and said all he needed to do was finish. So did everybody I watch the fight with. The annoucers started his PAC MAN ahead in the first round and Pac Man never through a punch. Even the judge that voted for Pacman had it close.
Click to expand...

SUjagTILLiDIE said:
alot of those rounds Pac aint do much until the end. You cant let the crowd and the commentators tell you who won, but i did fell pac won lol.
Click to expand...

CATMENDUE2 said:
I agree and so did the judges and many others.
Click to expand...

CATMENDUE2 said:
Thats cause Pacman threw 200 less punches.
Click to expand...

Antroy said:
Dude, that's only 88 fewer punches! 839-751= 88 not 200!

I watched this fight from beginning to end and there is no way Bradley had that fight won. Pacquiao was sticking Bradley the entire match. There was one round where they did a punch count and so far in that round Bradley had only thrown 9 punches! 9 dayum punches?!?! Come on man.

With the way boxing is going, I wouldn't be surprised if Vince McMahon came out to the ring one day soon and said that he's the man behind boxing. I have more respect for professional wrestling than I do for boxing right now.
Click to expand...

CATMENDUE2, Sorry, you're not making much since, LOL. First you say Bradley won, then you agree with a post that said Manny won, then somehow you manage to say the Manny threw 200 fewer punches when it was really 88. :lol:
 
Scoring a fight round by round versus just watching and choosing a winner is very different. Last night pacquaio had some convincing rounds, yet there were others that were rather mundane. Judges apparently gave all those rounds to Bradley. Those were experienced judges, and they each scored it 7-5 either way.
 
I hope once and for all, you Pacman lover can see that Floyd would have had him for lunch. Bradley is not even on Floyd's level, not even in the same zip code.
 



wahines said:
I hope once and for all, you Pacman lover can see that Floyd would have had him for lunch. Bradley is not even on Floyd's level, not even in the same zip code.
Click to expand...

Very True. . . I said after the Marquez fight that Pacquioa has been exposed and there is no way Floyd would have any trouble. Not only beating him . . But knocking him out. Floyd is the best counter puncher to ever lace them up and pacquioa throws a million punches a round. . . And after this less than dominant performance over second tier competition, the writing is on the wall. Come May 2013, Mayweather knocks Pacquioa out in 8 or less..

Now having said all that, dude did get robbed man. Incredible that the judges even had the fight close. And I do believe that Bob Arum is behind this no matter how he's spinning it now. He's gone make a lot of money off the rematch which could be his last fight with Pacquioa because their contract will be up. . . Follow the money man and it leads back to Arum . .
 
GoodFella said:
I think Bradley will defeat Pacman tonight :)
Click to expand...

This is why boxing has become a shat sport run by crimminals. PACMAN beat his azz and still lost the fight on the judges card. :smh:

Just like with Don King back in the old days, how in hell is one sport, letting one person, person, ABRUM, control both fighters in that fight. There was an automatic re-match clause in the contract in case Pacman lost. It will be AT LEAST the 1st of the new year, 2013, before any Mayweather/Pacman fight can happen if it ever happens. This sham was done so that Abrum can have another big fight while he wait on Money Mayweather to get out of jail. Pacman against the new, undefeated upstart with a big pay-day against Mayweather awaiting the winner. :smh:
 
Last edited:
wahines said:
I hope once and for all, you Pacman lover can see that Floyd would have had him for lunch. Bradley is not even on Floyd's level, not even in the same zip code.
Click to expand...

I say MONEY will beat him but if you saying PACMAN lost that fight the other night, you crazy. :lol:
 
I have no sympathy for Pac. He got 3 gifts over Marquez. Now, the shoe is on the other foot. At least he ain't doing a lot of complaining.
 
wahines said:
I hope once and for all, you Pacman lover can see that Floyd would have had him for lunch. Bradley is not even on Floyd's level, not even in the same zip code.
Click to expand...

One could say the same going off of Floyd's last fight against Cotto. Pacman destroyed Cotto and Floyd struggled at times with him. Who knows?
 
Pacquaio has been in way too many close, competitive fights for me to give him much chance with Mayweather. He done lost 4, then the 3 with Marquez.
 
I also find it interesting that since Mayweather first demanded the Olympic style testing, Pac ain't had a single KO. Not one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top