Nike New NFL Uniforms


You can't really tell the difference in many of the uniforms. I will stick with my reebok made jersery.
 



JSU*Toi said:
You can't really tell the difference in many of the uniforms.
Click to expand...

For some franchises, that's a good thing.

552578_10150780810837814_99559607813_11879902_644121263_n.jpg
 
JSU*Toi said:
You can't really tell the difference in many of the uniforms. I will stick with my reebok made jersery.
Click to expand...

Yeah there are very slight differences in the uniforms...such as number placement, striping, etc.

The only team who had a major overhaul was Seattle.
 
Remember that the NFL regulates how often the uniforms can undergo redesign. A team can only request it every "x" years. So, you know that there wasn't going to be anything significant. It's part of the marketing strategy.
 
New unis: Packers reject all changes

I passed along a link Tuesday to view the individual team pages for Nike's rollout of 2012 NFL uniforms. If you scrolled over to the Green Bay Packers' page, you saw this note: "The Green Bay Packers have chosen to stay with their traditional design aesthetic as well as their former uniform fabrication for the coming season."

[+] Enlarge
Green Bay PackersJoe Faroni/ESPNThe Packers kept things the same with their new Nike uniforms.
What exactly does that mean? I sought some clarity from the Packers, and here's what I can tell you:

Most team uniform styles were changed in subtle ways. For example, the Detroit Lions have a duller version of gray on their pants. Some teams have new-look collars. The Chicago Bears moved their television numbers from the sleeves of the jerseys to the shoulders.

The Packers allowed absolutely no changes to their classic look, not even the most simple alteration in color or shade. The only difference is the Nike logo, according to spokesman Aaron Popkey.

http://espn.go.com/blog/nflnation/tag/_/name/nfl-uniforms-2012
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top