The Founder
Well-Known Member
Extremely interesting and well written.
https://www.poz.com/blog/navigating...ign=Sergeant+With+HIV+Sues+Defense+Department
Describing the impact of HIV is complicated. It’s a balancing act whose language depends on who is listening. But can we navigate that turf—or those turfs—with honesty, credibility and integrity?
To a newly diagnosed person, we stress the normalcy of life with HIV, that a person diagnosed at 20 can expect to live to 70 and beyond. We suggest that treatment is easy today, with side effects unlikely. The message is bouncy and business as usual, with a few pesky reminders about adherence—and about disclosure where required by law.
To the HIV-negative person, it’s quite different; we make clear that HIV is a disease to be avoided at all costs.
To those who fund us, the message we send is that HIV remains a pandemic and a threat that must be wrestled to the ground at any cost.
We argue among ourselves over whether HIV really is a “chronic manageable condition.” We argue over whether stigma is better or worse than it once was.
Few though make the case that HIV is an ordinary disease. It never has been. As World Health Organization put it: “HIV, with its long incubation period, its multiple modes of often intimate transmission, and its defiance of monumental efforts to develop a vaccine and a definitive cure, is one of the most complex, the most challenging and arguably the most devastating of all infectious diseases that humanity has ever had to face.”
Also unique to HIV is criminalization and a host of societal ills that both act as a cultivator for HIV and worsen its impact. There is inequality, and there is unfairness. There is shame, there is self-stigma. There are workplace and housing issues and gender issues and race issues and access to treatment issues. HIV is one complicated disease.
https://www.poz.com/blog/navigating...ign=Sergeant+With+HIV+Sues+Defense+Department
Describing the impact of HIV is complicated. It’s a balancing act whose language depends on who is listening. But can we navigate that turf—or those turfs—with honesty, credibility and integrity?
To a newly diagnosed person, we stress the normalcy of life with HIV, that a person diagnosed at 20 can expect to live to 70 and beyond. We suggest that treatment is easy today, with side effects unlikely. The message is bouncy and business as usual, with a few pesky reminders about adherence—and about disclosure where required by law.
To the HIV-negative person, it’s quite different; we make clear that HIV is a disease to be avoided at all costs.
To those who fund us, the message we send is that HIV remains a pandemic and a threat that must be wrestled to the ground at any cost.
We argue among ourselves over whether HIV really is a “chronic manageable condition.” We argue over whether stigma is better or worse than it once was.
Few though make the case that HIV is an ordinary disease. It never has been. As World Health Organization put it: “HIV, with its long incubation period, its multiple modes of often intimate transmission, and its defiance of monumental efforts to develop a vaccine and a definitive cure, is one of the most complex, the most challenging and arguably the most devastating of all infectious diseases that humanity has ever had to face.”
Also unique to HIV is criminalization and a host of societal ills that both act as a cultivator for HIV and worsen its impact. There is inequality, and there is unfairness. There is shame, there is self-stigma. There are workplace and housing issues and gender issues and race issues and access to treatment issues. HIV is one complicated disease.