Lottery Winner Comes Forward After Divorce


BayouBandit03

Future TxSu Law Student
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. - It took Robert G. Swofford Jr. more than a month to come forward and claim his $60 million Lotto prize, but he had to take care of some unfinished business — divorcing his wife.



Swofford, a postal worker from Seminole County, claimed his prize on Tuesday in a $34.7 million lump sum payout, ending weeks of mystery about who won the Nov. 24 drawing.


Swofford, 53, and his wife separated three years ago. But two weeks after the winning numbers were announced, Ann Swofford served him with divorce papers and claimed a share of the prize.


Just before Christmas, the Swoffords and their lawyers hammered out an agreement. His wife will get $5.25 million and $1 million will be set aside to support their 11-year-old son. In return, she agreed not to seek any more of Swofford's winnings.


Swofford said he remembered reading about a divorce case where a lottery winner kept it a secret and was penalized in court.


"I'd heard of a case in California where a judge heard about it after he had settled the divorce case and took the husband to the cleaners and made him pay everything he had left out of his lottery winnings," Swofford said Tuesday in Tallahassee. "I feel peaceful. She has money to, you know, raise my son and I feel that I am contributing to the welfare of my son."


Lawyers for both sides said they expect the divorce to be completed within the next week or two.


Ann Swofford has an unpublished phone number and couldn't be reached for comment.


Swofford, an ex-Special Forces member, has taken leave from the U.S. Postal Service, where he is a forklift operator.


His base salary was $41,000 a year, though he earned $65,000 in 2004, according to his divorce file. Just five years ago, a mortgage company foreclosed on Swofford's home and he was forced to file for bankruptcy protection.


"Oh, I think it's wrong to say that it's not going to change my life but I don't think it's going to give me a bigger head," Swofford said. "I'm still going to have to wake up in the morning, put one leg in my trousers and put the other one in and get dressed like everybody else."


http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050106/ap_on_re_us/lottery_winner_divorce
 



JSTUS said:
Her bad. She settled for far too less.

How is that?

She left him 3 years ago and he's been on his own since. I can understand getting money for the child but for her...... :rolleyes:
 
See, that is why you need to handle your business before all this. After 1 1/2 year, you should know that you're not going to get back with this person, so those papers should have been filed atleast over 1 1/2 years ago.
 
BayouBandit03 said:
His wife will get $5.25 million and $1 million will be set aside to support their 11-year-old son.
:tdown::tdown:

5 million to the ex-wife (even though they aint been together in 3 years) and only 1 million for the kid.
 
If she ain't go half on the lotto ticket, I don't see why SHE has to profit. The kid, yes...
 
Blacknbengal said:
See, that is why you need to handle your business before all this. After 1 1/2 year, you should know that you're not going to get back with this person, so those papers should have been filed atleast over 1 1/2 years ago.

EXACTLY. Here in Georgia an uncontested divorce can be settled in a matter of months, so there is no excuse for letting things linger that long unless there is hope for a reconciliation. One of the parties should have filed once they realized that it was over.
 
Red1 said:
If she ain't go half on the lotto ticket, I don't see why SHE has to profit. The kid, yes...

Because even if they weren't together, in the eyes of the law, they were married.

The way I see it, if she's like most of the mothers I know, the bulk of the 5 million will be spent on the child.
 
Vinita said:
Because even if they weren't together, in the eyes of the law, they were married.

The way I see it, if she's like most of the mothers I know, the bulk of the 5 million will be spent on the child.
:nod: :tup:

The divorce should have been settled waaay before the three years though...but hey, technically, they were still married. I believe the child should have had more loot set aside for him/her, though.
 
Vinita said:
Because even if they weren't together, in the eyes of the law, they were married.

Lawfully, yes. Practically, no.

The way I see it, if she's like most of the mothers I know, the bulk of the 5 million will be spent on the child.

:read:
 
Now, if he were smart and didn't want her to get ANYTHING, he would have had a relative or friend claim the prize, then get a "gift" after the divorce was final.
 
jag4life said:
Now, if he were smart and didn't want her to get ANYTHING, he would have had a relative or friend claim the prize, then get a "gift" after the divorce was final.
I never thought of that. :lmao:

But, I'd be careful WHO I gave the ticket to.
 



jag4life said:
Now, if he were smart and didn't want her to get ANYTHING, he would have had a relative or friend claim the prize, then get a "gift" after the divorce was final.
now, that's a good one...but just as Red stated, you'd really have to trust who you give the ticket to. :tup:
 
The title of the article is misleading. The wife filed for the divorce 2 weeks after he'd won asking for her portion. Now, because they failed to end what was already ended, the share factor comes into play. He either shares, settles and goes on, or she could hold out on the divorce. You normally have to claim a prize within 180 days...so, he can give a little now or he WILL give her more later and he just for good measure, she may never divorce him.
 
jag4life said:
Now, if he were smart and didn't want her to get ANYTHING, he would have had a relative or friend claim the prize, then get a "gift" after the divorce was final.


becareful J4L, that lil project could blow up in your face.

When money is involved, family will get scandolous.

He should have just hired a hit man to take her out so all the money could be for him and the child. (J/K)
 
"I'd heard of a case in California where a judge heard about it after he had settled the divorce case and took the husband to the cleaners and made him pay everything he had left out of his lottery winnings," Swofford said Tuesday in Tallahassee. "I feel peaceful. She has money to, you know, raise my son and I feel that I am contributing to the welfare of my son."

I think based on this that the judge would have probably caught on to his plan if he tried to slide a relative into play with this. She probably would have brought him back into court and increased his child support payments or something.
 
BandFan said:
becareful J4L, that lil project could blow up in your face.

When money is involved, family will get scandolous.

He should have just hired a hit man to take her out so all the money could be for him and the child. (J/K)

I trust my mom and my sister and my grandmother. Also, I have 3 friends who I'd trust with it. They all would do it in a heartbeat. One of them, even if he won the money himself I'd be hooked up.
 
Vinita said:
The way I see it, if she's like most of the mothers I know, the bulk of the 5 million will be spent on the child.

:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
 
BayouBandit03 said:
TALLAHASSEE, Fla.

"I'd heard of a case in California where a judge heard about it after he had settled the divorce case and took the husband to the cleaners and made him pay everything he had left out of his lottery winnings," Swofford said Tuesday in Tallahassee. "I feel peaceful. She has money to, you know, raise my son and I feel that I am contributing to the welfare of my son."

Actually it was the other way around
 
bluedog said:
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

WTF is so funny?

You know of mothers who would spend more of that on themselves than their children?
 
Back
Top