Larry Bird says NBA needs more white superstars


jelli

Music Lover
NBCSports.com news services
Updated: 5:48 p.m. ET June 09, 2004Larry Bird says he knows what the NBA needs -- more white superstars. The NBA legend and Indiana Pacers President of basketball operations said in an interview with ESPN that while the NBA will always be dominated by black players, the presence of more white stars would appeal to the majority of its fans.

Rest of the story

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5174054/
 
jelli said:
NBCSports.com news services
Updated: 5:48 p.m. ET June 09, 2004Larry Bird says he knows what the NBA needs -- more white superstars. The NBA legend and Indiana Pacers President of basketball operations said in an interview with ESPN that while the NBA will always be dominated by black players, the presence of more white stars would appeal to the majority of its fans.

Rest of the story

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5174054/



jelli,

This will probably get moved to the sports board.
 



No wonder the Memphis Grizzlies has more White players than any other team in the NBA.I can understand what he saying though.
 
I guess signing all those players from overseas backfired. Utah couldn't win with them and Larry threw in a few and didn't make the championship.
 
jelli said:
NBCSports.com news services
Updated: 5:48 p.m. ET June 09, 2004Larry Bird says he knows what the NBA needs -- more white superstars. The NBA legend and Indiana Pacers President of basketball operations said in an interview with ESPN that while the NBA will always be dominated by black players, the presence of more white stars would appeal to the majority of its fans.

Rest of the story

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5174054/

I read some of what was posted on msn.com.

:smh: @ Larry

:tdown: :tdown:
 
I understand what Larry B is trying to say. More white boys means more white folks in the arena which means more greenbacks in his pockets. Sad thing is, it ain't happening.
 
Bottom line, if the white boys can't outplay the black boys, they shouldn't be there....and I don't see how anyone's pockets are being neglected, because all the NBA games are full of white folks. :rolleyes:
 
SU's Finest '93 said:
Bottom line, if the white boys can't outplay the black boys, they shouldn't be there....and I don't see how anyone's pockets are being neglected, because all the NBA games are full of white folks. :rolleyes:


My point exactly...I took my son to the Hornets Heat game back in Feb(yes the tickets were free) and it was not that many of "us" there...And no one is suffering financially. Imagine if the NBA were like the Red Arebauch days with the lilly white Celtics(and Bill Russell), before the emergence of David Thompson, Dr J., Wilt Chamberlain, Connie Hawkins, George Gervin and Walt Frazier...the league would be SUFFERING!!!

Bottom line, they know that our black basketball athletes will continue to add flare and "Oooo's and Ahh's" to the game. Its good for business. IF he wants more white superstars, tell him to start a league in Turkey, the former USSR and any other european country.


:shh:
 
Professional sports only survives because of white people. White people are the VAST majority of people that buy tickets. From Larry's perspective, it may be nice to have a white superstar, but not having one isn't going to hurt the league.
 
I worry about his comments from a racial perspective. The professional basketball world has a lot of respect for Larry Bird. And I think his comments will add fuel to the argument for raising even higher the eligibility academic requirements for athletes in American colleges, and even high schools. Historically, raising academic standards has proved successful in eliminating a high percentage of minority players from the playing fields. With a great percentage of these black players being legislated from competition, more doors would open for your more marginal white players to step up.

I think these marginal white players should be required to do what previous legislation has required black players to do: step up to the plate. When academic requirements were being raised in past years, black players were required to hit the books more and work harder in order to satisfy raised academic standards. While many failed to step up, many did in fact rise up to the new levels. All of us know star-quality athletes whose talents were wasted because they did not or could not generate the intellectual effort to satisfy rising academic requirements. White players should be required to do the same. They should be required to work on and polish their game skills so as to be able to compete with the best in their respective sports. They do it in baseball (starting with little league) all the time. After all, genetics has little to do with it. Just look at Larry Bird, Danny Ainge, John Stockton, and many, many more.

Again, what concerns me are the racial implications of his comments. I believe they will add fuel to the argument for raising academic requirements once again as an exclusionary measure to reduce minority presence in professional sports, and especially basketball.
 
I think those who are offended by the comments should see the interview in its entirety. It aired last night and I'm pretty sure it'll air several more times. It's was a roundtable, on stools, half court in a gym w/ Magic, LaBron and Carmello. I thought he spoke truth overall. The NBA could use a white star. What I thought he'd receive flack for is when he said he "felt insulted when opposing coaches would send a white guy to guard me." Or the back handed compliment "everyone knows African Americans are the best athletes in the world."
 
Serious Question for thought:

Do you guys think the overall quality of play in the NBA would be better if there were more white players?
 
GramFan said:
Serious Question for thought:

Do you guys think the overall quality of play in the NBA would be better if there were more white players?
No. We bring excitement to everything. It's a reason why suburb kids emulate inner city kids. To be frank "Black folk just got style".
 
GramFan said:
Serious Question for thought:

Do you guys think the overall quality of play in the NBA would be better if there were more white players?


NEGATIVE!!!


but who knows...If they play more like Jason Williams #2 for the Grizzlies...
 



Jason williams is only emulating these black players. i think what larry was saying is the league needs more white stars instead of foreign stars.if he has any sence he would know blacks cannot be replaced for whites but foreign players can be . i think he accepts the fact that black players are ballers but he may feel that there are some white players who don't get their chance cause of a foreign player who is more hyped . i don't think he meant it as choosing or hyping white players over blacks but he might mean white over some overrated foreign players. i hope that is what he means!!!!!!!!!we take over everything anyway. we got evey sport on lock almost. every major record has been broken or will be broken by a black person .THANK GOD FOR JESSE OWENS SHOWING THE WORLD WE ARE JUST AS GOOD IF NOT BETTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Hell I'm not worried about white players in the NBA...we should be worried about the systematic elimination of white defensive backs in the NFL..they are threatened to extinction...quick name me two white corners you seen play in the last 5 years...name two white safeties besides John Lynch...

(SIDE NOTE: Big misconception..Larry was talking about U.S. born and bred caucasian players..not anyone like steve nash or dirk nowitski..)

Now I can theorize why Bird said he felt disrespected when the other team sent a white guy to guard him...think about it..He's Larry Bird..and he's probably been told that he couldn't do nothing if a brotha guarded him..so he wanted a brotha to guard him to show that he belongs and he was truly one of the best in the business..

also, I was listening to the radio and someone was talking about comparing this to the Rush Dimbaugh statements about black QBs...that's like comparing Tupac to MC Brains..not even in the same league
 
Earle said:
I worry about his comments from a racial perspective. The professional basketball world has a lot of respect for Larry Bird. And I think his comments will add fuel to the argument for raising even higher the eligibility academic requirements for athletes in American colleges, and even high schools. Historically, raising academic standards has proved successful in eliminating a high percentage of minority players from the playing fields. With a great percentage of these black players being legislated from competition, more doors would open for your more marginal white players to step up.

The owners and the agents are making too much money, and they have kids jumping from HS to the NBA. Five years from now, you won't be using academic anything and NBA in the same sentence. I heard a clip from Jim Rome interviewing Amari Stoudamire the other day where the player straight-up said that he took $125K as a favor from his former agent during his senior year in HS "to help out his family" and had no intention of paying it back. Too much money in the game to make academics an issue.

Earle said:
I think these marginal white players should be required to do what previous legislation has required black players to do: step up to the plate. ...

And that is all Larry Bird is saying. It was his plea for White American players to come and be a part of the game just like he was: Gimme the next Great White Hope.
 
Journalist said:
...quick name me two white corners you seen play in the last 5 years...name two white safeties besides John Lynch...

Quick, name me two BLACK OWNERS of professional sports franchises besides Bob Johnson.

:rolleyes:
 
Deuce said:
Quick, name me two BLACK OWNERS of professional sports franchises besides Bob Johnson.

:rolleyes:


If I'm not mistaken Jimmy Jam and Terry Lewis own 30% of the T Wolves.
 
Deuce said:
Quick, name me two BLACK OWNERS of professional sports franchises besides Bob Johnson.

:rolleyes:

hey..the white DB's comment was sarcastic in nature...
Bob Johnson is probably gonna tape delay the Bobcats game to show videos and then sell the Bobcats off to Viacom like he did BET :jump:

Heck, IMO, the only reason why Bob Johnson got that team was Charlotte (like Cleveland when they let the Browns move to Baltimore and become the Ravens) were desparate for a pro team and Bob Johnson and Co. came up with enough dough to make it happen...Wasn't a group with Larry Bird trying to bid on it too.....It was a matter of convenience for the NBA to show they wanted black owners along with the desparation of a city that initially balked at a taxpayer-funded arena (which they are now building, thank ya very much)...Would you think the NBA really would've preferred having an exmapnsion team owned by one of its 50 greatest players or Bob Johnson? Johnson getting that team, as I said a second early, was a matter of convenience.

If the NBA was sooo receptive to Bob Johnson, why weren't they to Isaiah Thomas when he wanted majority interest of the Raptors...why MJ was ran out of Washington by Abe Pollian like he embezzled funds...Why Magic (worth about $500 million or more) hasn't been heard of trying to get a bigger chunk of a team rather than the 5-10 percent of the Lakers Dr. Jerry Buss let him keep?

Heck I'll do you one better...how many real decision-makers of the teams (GMs and VP of operations) in the NBA are African-American besides Joe Dumars and Zeke
 
Thanks DAContinent and FAB5 for clearing up Mr. Bird's statement for me. I did not see the interview, and if I had understood his comments within the framework of what you guys have expressed, I probably would not have posted my comments at all. Thanks again.
 
Blacks don't have the sports on lock. What about baseball and hockey. There is definitely a lack of representation in those sports.
 
Back
Top