Jacksonese Algebra


x = J1-5t

Solve for X. And, make sure you show your work.

a couple of ways to look at it... ok assuming we factor in the point in which J and T appear in the alaphabet (which is 10 and 20 respectively) we come up with x=-90(10x1-5x20)....or, if we use the system that assumes that the positions the alphabets only being numbered 0-9 nine, assuming A is one, we come up with 0 (0x1-5x0) :idea:
 



a couple of ways to look at it... ok assuming we factor in the point in which J and T appear in the alaphabet (which is 10 and 20 respectively) we come up with x=-90(10x1-5x20)....or, if we use the system that assumes that the positions the alphabets only being numbered 0-9 nine, assuming A is one, we come up with 0 (0x1-5x0) :idea:
:lmao::lmao::lmao:
:lmao::lmao::lmao:


but, how do you factor in the number of "fans" who left early and I'm sure you have to account for the boos. Plus, you have to consider that it was at Confederate Memorial. and I know somewhere in there, you have to divide by the number of diversions.

And not to mention, you have to multiply all dem damn tears!

:bawling::bawling::bawling::bawling:
:bawling::bawling::bawling::bawling:
:bawling::bawling::bawling::bawling:
:bawling::bawling::bawling::bawling:
:bawling::bawling::bawling::bawling:
 
:lmao::lmao::lmao:
:lmao::lmao::lmao:


but, how do you factor in the number of "fans" who left early and I'm sure you have to account for the boos. Plus, you have to consider that it was at Confederate Memorial. and I know somewhere in there, you have to divide by the number of diversions.

And not to mention, you have to multiply all dem damn tears!

:bawling::bawling::bawling::bawling:
:bawling::bawling::bawling::bawling:
:bawling::bawling::bawling::bawling:
:bawling::bawling::bawling::bawling:
:bawling::bawling::bawling::bawling:

That's where you have to calculate the anti-derivative of the forseen quotient. Then invert it...and multiply by the LCM of the whole thing...I think. No matter how you look at it, the answer should come out to either .20 or .16

I HATE math...
 
That's where you have to calculate the anti-derivative of the forseen quotient. Then invert it...and multiply by the LCM of the whole thing...I think. No matter how you look at it, the answer should come out to either .20 or .16

:lmao::lmao::lmao:

but hol up,

They had 19 returning starters, so you have to take the square root of 19 and then subtract the number of buffets Booga will close down this week. Right there, I think that equates to a -5.
:confused:
 
:lmao::lmao::lmao:

but hol up,

They had 19 returning starters, so you have to take the square root of 19 and then subtract the number of buffets Booga will close down this week. Right there, I think that equates to a -5.
:confused:

LOL

~sigh~

"Logarithms"...smh...I was NEVER good at those...

But as X approaches infinity, you'll find that base product of the cubed root of the change in distance over the change in time cannot be fundamentally determined.

So, in essence, if you use this Jacksoneese Logic, the answer should actually be an infinte set of question marks.

So therefore, if

x = J1-5t

then X = ???...?
 
Greeting to my fellow Jacksonese Algebrians...

Question:

Do you jstank actually think because they have a 16% record this means they have a 61% chance of winning the SCG?

Help me out, because as you all know this type of math is the most confusing of them all... And I done took some math classes that was cause you to lose your FN mind...
 
:lmao::lmao::lmao:

but hol up,

They had 19 returning starters, so you have to take the square root of 19 and then subtract the number of buffets Booga will close down this week. Right there, I think that equates to a -5.
:confused:

LOL

~sigh~

"Logarithms"...smh...I was NEVER good at those...

But as X approaches infinity, you'll find that base product of the cubed root of the change in distance over the change in time cannot be fundamentally determined.

So, in essence, if you use this Jacksoneese Logic, the answer should actually be an infinte set of question marks.

So therefore, if

x = J1-5t

then X = ???...?

ROTDF....LMMAO!!!!!! :emlaugh: :bawling: :emlaugh: :bowdown:
 
Greeting to my fellow Jacksonese Algebrians...

Question:

Do you jstank actually think because they have a 16% record this means they have a 61% chance of winning the SCG?

Help me out, because as you all know this type of math is the most confusing of them all... And I done took some math classes that was cause you to lose your FN mind...

If you go by the Imperial Jacksoneese Formula, then the answer is a resounding YES! Either that or an endless set of question marks (see explanation above).

But on Earth (ie Everywhere else BUT Jackson Mississippi), common sense tells us that they are just high on hope. There is no way a team with that record is gonna win the SCG...much less make it there. They've sucked all this time. I doubt that they are gonna magically turn it around in the middle of the season, while the rest of the SWAC falls off.
 
If you go by the Imperial Jacksoneese Formula, then the answer is a resounding YES! Either that or an endless set of question marks (see explanation above).

But on Earth (ie Everywhere else BUT Jackson Mississippi), common sense tells us that they are just high on hope. There is no way a team with that record is gonna win the SCG...much less make it there. They've sucked all this time. I doubt that they are gonna magically turn it around in the middle of the season, while the rest of the SWAC falls off.

But the Jackonese Algebraic equation says the following:

If Ruthland would have played game 1 and 2 they would be laughing at us all...

Even though Ruthland is the KING of INTs and look like he been hitting the buffet with Comegy on M W and F's....

But then one can say MWF = INT

Man this schit is giving me a headache...:sick:
 



I see someone is trying to be an internet gangster again....

I wonder if he will post Mumford seating chart and tell all of us SU and PV folk to come "FIND HIM"...

:shame:
 
But the Jackonese Algebraic equation says the following:

If Ruthland would have played game 1 and 2 they would be laughing at us all...

Even though Ruthland is the KING of INTs and look like he been hitting the buffet with Comegy on M W and F's....

But then one can say MWF = INT

Man this schit is giving me a headache...:sick:

So according to Jacksonese Logic, you're saying that:

M+W+F (assuming we are dealing with sums instead of products) = INT

and

INT = Winning the SCG???


M+W+T = INT = SCG

WOW!!! That crap really is confusing!!!

I think my theory, where the solution came up to an endless set of question marks is the most feasible.

x = J1-5t = ???...? = :confused:
 
I see someone is trying to be an internet gangster again....

I wonder if he will post Mumford seating chart and tell all of us SU and PV folk to come "FIND HIM"...

:shame:


You been baiting and posting bullshat for 2 weeks trying to get me to post.
Now that I have, you happy now, got your nutt off, feel included into the conversation.

And as for the seating chart, you didn't come down so why bring it up?
That chance passed you by.
You got a response boy, Happy now?
 
Last edited:
Ya'll want to lick nutt's, I point it out.
I come on here to see Texas Southern made threads and all I get is bammas, Suckers, and Puke View. :lol:

<img src="http://www.funatiq.com/images/never-give-up-caricature.jpg">

:emlaugh: Hold on players!!!!!!!!!!! :emlaugh:
 
See bitch.
You been baiting and posting bullshat for 2 weeks trying to get me to post to your fag ass.
Now that I have, you happy now, got your nutt off, feel included into the conversation.

And as for the seating chart, you didn't come down so why bring it up ?
That chance passed you by.
You got a response boy, Happy now?


Dang man! Random hostility! I thought yall were happy that yall beat SU! What's up? Im'ma let yall have this one though...I ain't in it...lol
 
Back
Top