I Can't Take It Any More!!!


That's not right. You all are 6-6 the last 11 years. You all played them 1 extra time in a championship game and loss. :lol: :emlaugh:

uuuuum, that is why I corrected you. YOU originally said 10 years trying to make it even. You can change it to 11 years if that makes you feel better.
 
This is what I don't understand.. why do schools with multiple losing seasons try to put themselves on the level of JSU. They say stuff like in the last 5 years, we have one SWAC title and JSU has NONE.. but they totally forget that they had like 4 losing seasons... I don't get it.

Most of you all have programs that SUCK. Seriously.
 



Ok.....So you all are 5-5 the last 10 meeting 6-6 the last twelve meeting. Both of you all have one championship the last 10 years. Please know that the bottom line jsu is no better than the Mighty Lions of UAPB. :lol: :emlaugh:


We are much better than them. ..just like we are much better than SU. You had to try to go ALLLLL the way back to the **** era to TRY to make an agrument. In two years... ALL **** wins will roll off...and ALL of you will be :bawling:
 
You can't count.

2003-2013 is ELEVEN years
2004-2013 is 10 years. You don't get credit for one of your **** wins anymore.







Yes, I can count.

You didn't read my post. Where did I say it was eleven years? What I did say/post was that since 2003, we've played JSU a total of 11 times. I said nothing about years.
 
This is what I don't understand.. why do schools with multiple losing seasons try to put themselves on the level of JSU. They say stuff like in the last 5 years, we have one SWAC title and JSU has NONE.. but they totally forget that they had like 4 losing seasons... I don't get it.

Most of you all have programs that SUCK. Seriously.

PREACH........:clap: :clap:
 
We are much better than them. ..just like we are much better than SU. You had to try to go ALLLLL the way back to the **** era to TRY to make an agrument. In two years... ALL **** wins will roll off...and ALL of you will be :bawling:

The championships and head to head numbers against UAPB don't reflect that. You guys have faired a little better in divisional play. There can only be 1 champion though and one does not get glory because they were "runner ups." You guys have 1 championship in 16 years. I know it is a tough pill to take, but it is what it is.........
 
The championships and head to head numbers against UAPB don't reflect that. You guys have faired a little better in divisional play. There can only be 1 champion though and one does not get glory because they were "runner ups." You guys have 1 championship in 16 years. I know it is a tough pill to take, but it is what it is.........

Well, that only suggests that championships and head-to-head don't tell the full story. I will admit that UAPB has been better comp than SU.
 
Well, that only suggests that championships and head-to-head don't tell the full story. I will admit that UAPB has been better comp than SU.

I didn't expect you to correct the fact that you guys now have 1 championship in 17 years (you only try to correct if it adds to your propaganda). Perhaps you're correct about the comp part. I vaguely remember UAPB putting 60+ point on you all a few years ago. That must have been pretty humiliating to receive that type of beating from a conference foe.
 
The championships and head to head numbers against UAPB don't reflect that. You guys have faired a little better in divisional play. There can only be 1 champion though and one does not get glory because they were "runner ups." You guys have 1 championship in 16 years. I know it is a tough pill to take, but it is what it is.........

Well, that only suggests that championships and head-to-head don't tell the full story. I will admit that UAPB has been better comp than SU.

You see he failed to mention we have 3 Championships in the last 20 years but I guess 16 sounds better using only SCG years.... :smh:
 
He acts like SWAC football only started with the SCG. From 1970 to 1993, su had ZERO SWAC titles outright. Now THAT'S as embarassing as anything JSU can offer. That's at least 23 years them ninjas couldn't win it. LOL!! 23 YEARS!!
 
He acts like SWAC football only started with the SCG. From 1970 to 1993, su had ZERO SWAC titles outright. Now THAT'S as embarassing as anything JSU can offer. That's at least 23 years them ninjas couldn't win it. LOL!! 23 YEARS!!

in the other thread, he said 1-4 in the SCG was an embarrassing number but uuuum SU was 1-5 vs JSU from 2006-2011.. :lmao:
 
He is not even using SCG years.....lol Dude does whatever he can to reach.

TP, you say that like it's not true. Are you shame of only winning 1 championship in 17 years? It is what it is. It's just a reality check that you guys haven't won more championships than over half of the conference in that time frame. That isn't a reach but a fact. I don't think you all made a very good decision to replace Comegy. It will be quite a while before you all win another, IMHO. My guess is Valley will probably win one before you all do again (that is not good for the conference).
 



And you guys got rid of the coach who did most of it, NOWWWW look at you. In your last 22 SWAC games, you've won only ONE SWAC game......ONE!! Damn you Valley!:smh::snicker:

Grambling Coaches vs JSU since 2000
Doug Willaims 5-2
Melvin Spears 2-0
Broadway 5-1
Ragsdale 0-1

12 - 4

No matter how u spin it, Grambling has dominated JSU
 
in the other thread, he said 1-4 in the SCG was an embarrassing number but uuuum SU was 1-5 vs JSU from 2006-2011.. :lmao:

TP in the grand scheme of things. Nobody remembers what you did in the regular season if you don't get that ring. You have to follow up that consistency of the great records with multiple titles. Every Franchise in the NFL would trade having multiple 12-4 seasons and no rings for a SB ring and 4 losing seasons surrounding it. That one SB would trump all of that. Ask the San Diego Chargers all the years they had great records and no rings. Same for KC under Marty. All this consistency is all fine and dandy. But what it also says is that you can't win the big one even though you have the wins every year during the season. Championships trump seasons. Nobody is going to remember the Patriots almost went undefeated a few years ago. Folks will always remember they didn't win the SB. The Giants have had subpar seasons in between their SBs. But no one will remember.They would gladly take those than not to have the SB wins they have. I bet the Patriots would trade that consistency for those 2 losses they had against them in the SB. I bet Tom Brady shole would rather have 5 rings instead and few losing seasons than all these winning seasons and the 3 rings he got now.

Look how they are doing Lebron and the Heat now. You would think they lost all 4 NBA Finals the way the media is doing them. So nobody 20 years from now will remember Comegy and JSU won all these games in the regular season. What they will remember is he only won 1 title and lost 3. That's how it is. Ask Peyton Manning. LOL.

So I will take the 1-5 against JSU from 06-2011 because hell we were 1-5 against a lot of teams. But the bottom line is we won against JSU when all the marbles were on the line. All I know whether it is 1999 or 2013. When SU has met JSU in the SCG. We are 2-0. That's all history is going to be worried about. When the title was on the line, SU delivered. Hell we are a bad pass away from being 4-0 in the SCG. But I will take 3-1.
 
Last edited:
in the other thread, he said 1-4 in the SCG was an embarrassing number but uuuum SU was 1-5 vs JSU from 2006-2011.. :lmao:

Come on now, during that time period we were 1-5 against quite a few teams(Grambling, UAPB, PV, etc..). During that time period, we were 31-35. We were 39-47 between 2005-2012. It was a very bad period for SU, and many teams took advantage of it.
 
Jackson State University has won 132 total SWAC Championships. UAPB has won 8 total SWAC Championships. You all enjoy the rest of your week. Just dropping by.
 
Back
Top