How Can We Control Our Classic Revenues


B

BISON-2K1

New Member
I can't think of any PWC that plays in front of 50k recieving only 150k as a payout.We bring in 50-70k but only get 5% or less of the revenue.The FC and BC should net each school 2.5 million at least or at least 10% of the revenue for each school.Why do our administrators allow themselves to be cheated.If the NO bowl with 19k can net each school 750k we need to demand at least that much.If not we need to boycott these classics until the neccessary changes are made.We may lose money at first but we will win in the long run.
 

KEEP IN MIND THAT THE PROMOTER IS SUPPOSED TO MAKE MORE MONEY THAT THE SCHOOLS. 200K TO 300K EACH IS MUCH, MUCH MORE THAN MOST SCHOOLS WOULD MAKE AT HOME, SOME SCHOOLS DON'T MAKE THAT IN A SEASON. IF YOUR TEAM HAS A BIG NAME THEN YOU ARE IN A POSITION TO MAKE BETTER DEALS. THE PROMOTER CAN MARKET YOUR TEAM BETTER TO THE SPONSORS. SOME SCHOOLS ARE REGIONAL AND CAN'T DEMAND CERTAIN THINGS. I THINK SCHOOLS NEED MARKETING REPS AND CONSULTANTS AND LAWYERS THAT ARE VERSED IN THESE MATTERS.
 
Originally posted by MACHIAVELLI
KEEP IN MIND THAT THE PROMOTER IS SUPPOSED TO MAKE MORE MONEY THAT THE SCHOOLS. 200K TO 300K EACH IS MUCH, MUCH MORE THAN MOST SCHOOLS WOULD MAKE AT HOME, SOME SCHOOLS DON'T MAKE THAT IN A SEASON. IF YOUR TEAM HAS A BIG NAME THEN YOU ARE IN A POSITION TO MAKE BETTER DEALS. THE PROMOTER CAN MARKET YOUR TEAM BETTER TO THE SPONSORS. SOME SCHOOLS ARE REGIONAL AND CAN'T DEMAND CERTAIN THINGS. I THINK SCHOOLS NEED MARKETING REPS AND CONSULTANTS AND LAWYERS THAT ARE VERSED IN THESE MATTERS.
Click to expand...

Mach has just provided you with an answer.

Some folks believe it is easier to collect money than to make money.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top