sophandros
Free Thinker
Re: There is good and bad at Div. 1A
Number 2 of your "Bad": You mean like Marshall, Central Florida, Akron, and Toledo?
The funding issue can be solved with TV rights, Bowl tie-ins, as well as pay day games (which is related to #1).
The I-A, I-AA distinction only exists in football, so the SWAC is D-I elsewhere. With the added funding, they can step up in other sports, as well. The SWAC has been competive in other sports in the past anyway, so that's less of an issue.
The last comment concerning attendance is not a concern for any of the schools that you named. They were fine with the standard before playing SU and JSU, and will be fine when SU decides to end the deal. The schools that have to worry are the Sunbelt conference.
Originally posted by Jaguar Diehard
The BAD:
1. Getting your butts kicked constantly on someone's homecoming.
2. Becoming even more forgettable as some of those MAC teams.
3. Funding to be able to compete and keep the required scholarship players.
4. Being competitive and supportive of OTHER sports.
The GOOD:
1. Recruiting would be a plus if you have an "away" game scheduled at Hawaii.
2. You can clock more dollars by scheduling teams like Texas A&M and SMU because it will be a Div. 1A game and will count as a stronger opponent than a Div. 1AA game.
3. You will upgrade to a better class of athletes because they WANT to play Div. 1A ball...at ANY cost!!!
Nonetheless, I think now is the time to jump. Others are about to get smacked down to Div. 1AA because of attendance requirements, but you know there will be grandfather clauses and other rationale.
Either way, if we jump up, the Tulanes' and USM's and SMU's will gobble us up contract-wise to not only help in the attendance, but the elimination of having to "step down" to the "lowly" Div. 1AA!
Just MHO!!!
Number 2 of your "Bad": You mean like Marshall, Central Florida, Akron, and Toledo?
The funding issue can be solved with TV rights, Bowl tie-ins, as well as pay day games (which is related to #1).
The I-A, I-AA distinction only exists in football, so the SWAC is D-I elsewhere. With the added funding, they can step up in other sports, as well. The SWAC has been competive in other sports in the past anyway, so that's less of an issue.
The last comment concerning attendance is not a concern for any of the schools that you named. They were fine with the standard before playing SU and JSU, and will be fine when SU decides to end the deal. The schools that have to worry are the Sunbelt conference.