C-Murder..................OUT For Good?!?!


staggalee83

War & Thunder
The judge apparently overturned his conviction because the prosecution hid the criminal backgrounds of their witnesses.....................CREDIBILITY.

Was he railroaded in LOU-ANNA?

He's been out a while on home confinement and now that's over with.
He also changed his stage name from C-Murder to C-Miller.......as in Corey Miller.

C-Murder escapes jail and home confinement
 
Thank goodness he's out.


And Im glad he changed his name.


I just see him in court.

Prosecutor: "Your Honor, his name is C-MURDA . I rest my case"
 



I've followed the story since the beginning. I knew some "technicality" would be his way out. :smh:
 
chocalate_topaz said:
Didn't he stomp a kid to death? And we're glad he's out? :(

Oh, my bad...he just SHOT a 16 year old kid.

Why was the 16 year old kid at the club? Didn't the arguement start INSIDE?
 
jag4life said:
No one saw him shoot... no weapon was found...

That's what I remember.
They got a conviction based on witness statements.

I remember Master P on 60 minutes saying he had no doubt this would be overturned when it first happened.

He was right.
 
He's awaiting a re-trial so he's not technically HOME-FREE.

Under the judge’s order, Miller can move freely in Jefferson and Orleans parishes, but must be home from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. He is barred from drinking alcohol and going to bars, and visitors to his residence are restricted.
 
kellis said:
He's awaiting a re-trial so he's not technically HOME-FREE.

Under the judge?s order, Miller can move freely in Jefferson and Orleans parishes, but must be home from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. He is barred from drinking alcohol and going to bars, and visitors to his residence are restricted.

Wait a minute...I'm confused...there will be a NEW trial?
 
kellis said:
He's awaiting a re-trial so he's not technically HOME-FREE.

Under the judge’s order, Miller can move freely in Jefferson and Orleans parishes, but must be home from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. He is barred from drinking alcohol and going to bars, and visitors to his residence are restricted.
sounds almost like house arrest.
 
Warndalyn said:
sounds almost like house arrest.

More similar to probation orders..

He was on house arrest before to the point that he was only able to go to like his grandmother's house and that is it. He stopped at a drive-thru on the way home and got in trouble for that.
 
kellis said:
He's awaiting a re-trial so he's not technically HOME-FREE.

Under the judge’s order, Miller can move freely in Jefferson and Orleans parishes, but must be home from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. He is barred from drinking alcohol and going to bars, and visitors to his residence are restricted.

Yep.............But if they deem those so-called "witnesses" not crediable, then he will be.
That's all the prosecution had...............third party account's, yet NOBODY saw C-Murder commit the incident in question right outside the club.:retard:

Sounds like some "story-telling" was going on.
 
You've got a dead kid. Somebody shot the gun. Maybe C-Miller, maybe not. So you saying they just "found" more than one person to say the same thing? Frame him for...what reason? They had no evidence but a jury came back with a unanimous guilty decision?

All I'll say is, I hope he doesn't get the same prosecutor. He is a MASTER, persuasive and captivating storyteller and formidable adversary.
 
chocalate_topaz said:
You've got a dead kid. Somebody shot the gun. Maybe C-Miller, maybe not. So you saying they just "found" more than one person to say the same thing? Frame him for...what reason? They had no evidence but a jury came back with a unanimous guilty decision?

All I'll say is, I hope he doesn't get the same prosecutor. He is a MASTER, persuasive and captivating storyteller and formidable adversary.

The people who testified only said they saw a crowd around the kid as he was shot. They didn't say C-Murder was shooting they only said he was there.

Those people who testified also were awaiting trial on other charges and were granted freedom for their testimonies.
 



i understand the scratch my back and I'll scratch your's theory. I just find it hard that good boy C-Murder was wanted off the streets so badly that they'd casually give people facing serious time freedom to convict him. Who cut that jacked up deal. So I gues...just a dumb jury.
 
chocalate_topaz said:
You've got a dead kid. Somebody shot the gun. Maybe C-Miller, maybe not. So you saying they just "found" more than one person to say the same thing? Frame him for...what reason? They had no evidence but a jury came back with a unanimous guilty decision?

All I'll say is, I hope he doesn't get the same prosecutor. He is a MASTER, persuasive and captivating storyteller and formidable adversary.

No ................................. I just know that during the course of trial's like this, if a person has a less than desirable crimminal record, police and prosecutors can basically get them to say anything they want. People will say anything not to go back to the "FARM" with only an implied "threat". And if it bring's them fame and some dollars for their story after the fact..............They going for it.

We have all seen it happen before.

Not saying that's the case but it's mighty strange that on the night they said this was happening, C-Millers testimony was people was messing with him and he left.............................YET NOBODY ACTUALLY SAW HIM DO ANYTHING IN A CROWDED PARKING LOT 5 MINUTES LATER.

Whoever killed that kid need to be caught and convicted even if it turns out to be a RAP STAR.
But if he didn't do it, he should not be prosecuted because he had an argument with someone that wound up dead and he go by the name C-Murder which was a big deal the first time in court.
Heck, it could have been one of those "way to serious" fans thinking he's doing ole boy a favor.
 
chocalate_topaz said:
Didn't he stomp a kid to death? And we're glad he's out? :(

Oh, my bad...he just SHOT a 16 year old kid.

That man is innocent until proven guilty. Maybe this time the prosecution will put on a fair trial instead of trying to create one for the sake of justice.
 
chocalate_topaz said:
He was CONVICTED, thus somebody prove guilt at that time.

A guy just got released in Ney York after 22 years of confinement for rape.
Dude was amazed at a dang CELL PHONE................He had never used one before.

HE WAS CONVICTED ALSO..................problem was............................THEY CONVICTED THE WRONG GUY using EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY.
 
Back
Top