FCS Attendance 2014


JSU/99 said:
Don't trust those numbers. At all. I don't see anything at SU(or any other school in that swac) that shows they're head and shoulders above the rest of the swac in revenue or resources.
No smack.
Click to expand...
Exactly. Just looking at surface data is not all there is to the entire equation.
 
JAG89 said:
You do realized what you just typed relates to EXPENSES, not revenue. You prove your lack intelligence whenever you type something.
Click to expand...
And you prove that you're not taking into account revenue AND expenses in the overall scheme of things. In the end, funding for expenses will still have to be counted.
 



JayRob said:
And you prove that you're not taking into account revenue AND expenses in the overall scheme of things. In the end, that money for expenses will still have to be counted.
Click to expand...

Okay Einstein, what is the OVERALL SCHEME OF THINGS??? Whatever it is, it still doesn't change the fact that revenue is not an expense and vice -versa.

26998d1337451109-lol-gif-myemoticone_image-gif-lol_lol.gif
 
JAG89 said:
Okay Einstein, what is the OVERALL SCHEME OF THINGS??? Whatever it is, it still doesn't change the fact that revenue is not an expense and vice -versa.
Click to expand...
You know what overall means. Each school has an athletic budget that accounts for expenses versus revenue. It's called the bottom line.
How many times must this be said before you catch on?
 
JayRob said:
You know what overall means. Each school has an athletic budget that accounts for expenses versus revenue. It's called the bottom line.
How many times must this be said before you catch on?
Click to expand...

Okay man, I guess you want me to say that we added to our revenue by eliminating a few non-revenue generating sports. But the financially correct way of saying it, we DECREASED EXPENSES by eliminating a few non-revenue generating sports.

26998d1337451109-lol-gif-myemoticone_image-gif-lol_lol.gif
 
You guys are talking budget, expenses - I'm talking revenue. Revenue is the money your program brings in from ticket sales, sponsorships, etc. Real numbers. I brought it up in this thread because I wanted to know whether the swac having the top attendance in FCS corresponds to us bringing in more revenue than the rest of the conferences. It sure hasn't led to increased success.
 
JSU/99 said:
You guys are talking budget, expenses - I'm talking revenue. Revenue is the money your program brings in from ticket sales, sponsorships, etc. Real numbers. I brought it up in this thread because I wanted to know whether the swac having the top attendance in FCS corresponds to us bringing in more revenue than the rest of the conferences. It sure hasn't led to increased success.
Click to expand...

Since most athletic programs in the SWAC are less subsidized than those in that other conference, one can only assume that more money is being generated from non-subsidized revenue funds, such as ticket sales, sponsorship, etc. And if you compared the SWAC to FCS PWC's, I'm sure overall SWAC schools required less subsidies to fund their athletic programs.
 
Last edited:
JSU/99 said:
You guys are talking budget, expenses - I'm talking revenue. Revenue is the money your program brings in from ticket sales, sponsorships, etc. Real numbers. I brought it up in this thread because I wanted to know whether the swac having the top attendance in FCS corresponds to us bringing in more revenue than the rest of the conferences. It sure hasn't led to increased success.
Click to expand...
Click on the USA link, And then click the name of the school ". It shows money from tickets sales, donations, and sponsorship.
 
JAG89 said:
Okay man, I guess you want me to say that we added to our revenue by eliminating a few non-revenue generating sports. But the financially correct way of saying it, we DECREASED EXPENSES by eliminating a few non-revenue generating sports.
Click to expand...
You were forced to decrease for a reason. Now laugh at that one.
Let's see how many more programs you'll be cutting after Jindal finishes his last touchup before he leaves office.
 
JayRob said:
You were forced to decrease for a reason. Now laugh at that one.
Let's see how many more programs you'll be cutting after Jindal finishes his last touchup before he leaves office.
Click to expand...

I hope you hold your breath along with Beans waiting for that. I guess your subscription to the Baton Rouge Advocate has expired. *snicker*
 



SUjagTILLiDIE said:
Click on the USA link, And then click the name of the school ". It shows money from tickets sales, donations, and sponsorship.
Click to expand...

I did. SU does well with its licensing and donations. All of us could do more with respect to fundraising. But again, I don't trust those numbers. JSU reported -0- for private donations for all years. I know for a fact that number is false. I never fully trust the numbers put out by the schools.
 
JAG89 said:
Then he needs to demand that Da Queen and her administration provide accurate numbers without getting slapped.
Click to expand...
Demand that Jindal and his administration provide accurate budget cut numbers without getting laughed out of his office.
 
JayRob said:
Demand that Jindal and his administration provide accurate budget cut numbers without getting laughed out of his office.
Click to expand...

That would be funny if there were anymore cuts coming. Again maybe you need to re-up your subscription to the Baton Rouge Advocate so you wouldn't make as much of an ass out of yourself.
 
PsychoJag said:
That would be funny if there were anymore cuts coming. Again maybe you need to re-up your subscription to the Baton Rouge Advocate so you wouldn't make as much of an ass out of yourself.
Click to expand...
Well, you keep saying I know everything about su. Guess you proved yourself wrong. Oh well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top