So, is sU banned or what?

[Jax]

Po coalition.

Did anyone actually SAY they wanted su sports to be banned? Why do you have to lie and make claim that anyone did?

...

 

[Blacknbengal]

BB, sorry for the late reply.

Yes, all of this is "messing" with the kids on the court. It was mentioned after the home loss to UAPB the men's team were concentrating on this issue too much. Banks and co. need to reel the guys in and get their mind right.

Also, it has been reported neither team's players are answering questions regarding it.

Thanks J94, you're a standup guy. Not like a lot of these other Jags on this board.

 

[Blankman2k5]

Always has been.

Personally I feel any team not meeting APR requirements should not be eligible for any sort of championship for the conference. Whether it is us or another school

 

["NOISE TALKA"]

The coalition doesn't no how to handle this matter. lol.

 

[Bleedbluefan]

I couldn't care less...ban them or don't. But if you make a rule, enforce it across the board Mr. Sharp.

 

["NOISE TALKA"]

There seems to be a double standard on this board....

You're catching on. lol

 

[southsuburbs]

Not the "Death Penalty". They can still play, but no post-season....like USC and Auburn in the past.

SU sports are currently banned from post-season activities.....I think this includes the softball and baseball teams as well.

Wait, what?! :retard:

I didn't know this.

And Jag-BR...you the first and ONLY one in my thread on the Sports Board talking about it's going to get messed up by folks posting nonsense, but after reading THIS thread...you were/are the main one posting nonsense. What's up with that?!

 

[southsuburbs]

Nope. And no automatic bid.

:lol:

This is funny...:smh:

 

[jag4life]

:lol:

This is funny...:smh:

What is? SWAC Track and Field (or any conference for that matter) does not qualify anyone for the NCAA postseason track events. You can qualify for NCAAs in the 1st track meet in December if you run fast enough.

 

[southsuburbs]

:lol:

This is funny...:smh:

The whole situation. The new vote. Everything. Basically proving that the ban was stupid in the first place.

 

[Blankman2k5]

You're catching on. lol

It is quite sad actually

 

[Tigerpride]

It is quite sad actually

You are the smartest non-Jacksonian on TSPN. You should have been a Blue Bengal.

 

[jag4life]

The whole situation. The new vote. Everything. Basically proving that the ban was stupid in the first place.

What new vote?

 

[Tigerpride]

What new vote?

To allow banned teams into SWAC tournaments.

 

[jag4life]

To allow banned teams into SWAC tournaments.

Oh ok. Didn't know about that one. Either way, our T&F was cleared by the NCAA to participate in the meet.

 

[southsuburbs]

Oh ok. Didn't know about that one.

Exactly! :lol:

 

[JR]

To allow banned teams into SWAC tournaments.

I think it is about the money TP. Plus again, you have a new council of Presidents than what was there in 2010. I mean how many of them folks are back from that time? Half?

 

[JayRob]

I think it is about the money TP. Plus again, you have a new council of Presidents than what was there in 2010. I mean how many of them folks are back from that time? Half?

New Presidents is no excuse. If the statute is already on the books, follow the statute. If not, then you may as well not have any statutes to begin with if one can vote to just do away with it.