Re: LSU and Alabama Better Try to Bust the Scoreboard on each other for To Match Hype
But the reason why they did the BCS was because of that 1997 debacle where both Michigan and Nebraska were No.1 and No.2 and clearly the best team in the country, yet they did not play each other. At least with the BCS you get No.1 vs. No.2
Sort of...
Here is a cliff notes version of how the BCS was born:
Prior to the BCS, there had been a history of split national championships or the top ranked schools not playing against each other during bowl season.
To address these problems, five conferences, six bowl games, and leading independent Notre Dame joined forces to create
the Bowl Coalition, which was intended to force a de facto "national championship game" between the top two teams. By entirely excluding all the other conferences. This system was in place from the 1992 season through the 1994 season. While traditional tie-ins between conferences and bowls remained, a team would be released to play in another bowl if it was necessary to force a championship game. However, this system did not include the Big Ten and Pac-12 champions, as both were obligated to play in the Rose Bowl.
The Bowl Coalition was restructured into
the Bowl Alliance for the 1995 season, involving five conferences (reduced to four for the 1996 season) and three bowls (Fiesta, Sugar, and Orange). The championship game rotated among these three bowls. It still did not, however, include the Pac-12 or Big Ten champions, the Rose Bowl, or any non-Bowl Alliance teams.
After a protracted round of negotiations, the Bowl Alliance was reformed into the Bowl Championship Series for the 1998 season. The Tournament of Roses Association agreed to release the Big Ten and Pac-10 champions if it was necessary to force a national championship game.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bowl_Championship_Series