Impact of Wall Street bailout becoming clearer


Blacknbengal

Well-Known Member
Though the devil's in the details of the emerging government response to the collapse on Wall Street, a clearer picture is beginning to emerge. Here are answers to some common questions about what it means for homeowners, consumers and taxpayers.

Why is this happening?
The system of financing homeownership has run off the rails after lenders ? and the investors who put up the money ? made what has turned out to be a trillion-dollar mistake.

There were a number of actors: borrowers who reached too far, mortgage brokers who pocketed big commissions on loans they knew were bad and Wall Street banks that packaged those bad loans, applied a little alchemy and sold them to investors, who didn?t bother to check carefully what they were buying and relied on rating agencies who gave their unfounded blessing on the investments.

Rest story
 
Bush: Rescue to pass
President sought to reassure markets bailout will pass, despite breakdowns.
By Jeanne Sahadi, CNNMoney.com senior writer
Last Updated: September 26, 2008: 10:03 AM ET
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- President Bush on Friday sought to reassure markets that Congress, despite a breakdown in negotiations on Thursday, would pass a $700 billion financial rescue plan.

"There are disagreements over aspects of the rescue plan. But there's no disagreement something must be done," the president said shortly after the U.S. stock market opened sharply lower on concerns that the bailout talks were being scuttled by politics. "The legislative process isn't pretty. But we are going to get a rescue package passed."

The congressional negotiations over the proposed package were set to resume on Friday.

On Thursday, Bush summoned lawmakers and the presidential candidates to the White House to rally consensus behind his plan. Instead, the meeting revealed a deep split between Democrats and House Republicans.

Late-night talks between lawmakers and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson - which were being conducted while federal banking regulators and executives were announcing the seizure and sale of Washington Mutual after the biggest bank failure in history - failed to reach agreement.

Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., the lead House Democrat on the issue who had been in close talks with Paulson for days, accused Republicans of refusing to negotiate.

"At this point, we have absolutely no participation or cooperation from House Republicans," Frank said.

While talks are set to resume Friday morning, any hopes of a clean, bipartisan legislative effort have broken down and the prospect of emergency weekend work on Capitol Hill looms large.

Agreeing on principles
Earlier in the afternoon on Thursday, the mood on Capitol Hill was very different.

Frank, Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., and other key lawmakers negotiating with Paulson announced that they had reached agreement on a set of principles for legislation to enact the historic proposal.

The bailout proposal - the most dramatic government intervention in the financial system since the Great Depression - calls for the Treasury Department to buy up bad mortgage securities from banks in an effort to get them to lend again.

The proposal, as amended by leaders in both chambers, will help homeowners, curb executive pay packages at participating firms and provide oversight of Treasury's actions, Dodd said in a lunchtime address.

"We've reached a fundamental agreement on a set of principles, one, for taxpayers, which is tremendously important," he said. "We're very confident we can act expeditiously."

A few hours later, after a widely anticipated White House meeting at which Bush said he expected a deal could be crafted "very shortly," the negotiations had broken down.

Details on the plans
The principles the Democrats said had been agreed upon call for Congress to make $250 billion available immediately with $100 billion available, if needed, without requiring additional congressional approval, said two senior Democratic aides familiar with the negotiations. The second half of $350 billion would then become available by a special approval of Congress.

On executive compensation, the draft would require limits on compensation for executives of any company participating in the bailout. These caps would apply for as long as the company is in the program. This would include some language to limit excess "golden parachutes."

Treasury would also get an equity stake in the companies being helped by the bailout, though what type remains to be worked out.

But House Republicans are not on board, according to Minority Leader Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio.

"House Republicans have not agreed to any plan at this point," Boehner said Thursday.

Instead, they issued a statement of economic rescue principles that calls for Wall Street to fund the recovery by injecting private capital - not taxpayer dollars - into the financial markets. Easing tax laws would prompt investors to put in their own dollars, they said.

Rest of the Story
 

House just voted the bill down. Dow dropped 500.points. I'm glad I work for the state.(I guess :confused: :lol:)
 
Retirement accounts have lost $2 trillion
By JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS, Associated Press Writer Julie Hirschfeld Davis, Associated Press Writer Tue Oct 7, 2:45 pm ET
WASHINGTON ? Americans' retirement plans have lost as much as $2 trillion in the past 15 months, Congress' top budget analyst estimated Tuesday.

The upheaval that has engulfed the financial industry and sent the stock market plummeting is devastating workers' savings, forcing people to hold off on major purchases and consider delaying their retirement, said Peter Orszag, the head of the Congressional Budget Office.

As Congress investigates the causes and effects of the financial meltdown, the House Education and Labor Committee was hearing from retirement savings and budget analysts on how the housing, credit and other financial troubles have battered pensions and other retirement funds, which are among the most common forms of savings in the United States.

"Unlike Wall Street executives, America's families don't have a golden parachute to fall back on," said Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., the panel chairman. "It's clear that their retirement security may be one of the greatest casualties of this financial crisis."

Rest
 
Some say restructuring the bankruptcy laws in 2005 is partially the blame. Consumers were able to wipe the slate clean with a Chapter 7; consumers were able to spend more, thus helping the economy, now most consumers must file a Chapter 13, paying the bankruptcy court instead of putting that money back into the economy.
 
It's the government's fault period. When there's no clear oversight and enforcement, fiscal incidents like these are bound to continue.
 
Back
Top