SWAC Mandate Requires Grambling To Play At Jackson State Through 2016


Status
Not open for further replies.
mighty hornet said:
screw being fair? :smh:
The remedy for your school getting "punished financially" is found in a court of law. Not by the SWAC creating unequal scheduling, when the other 8 conference teams had nothing to do with Gram not showing up to play JSU.
Click to expand...

Then you might want to address that with your president (or whoever is running ASU) because this was approved by the executive council.
 



mighty hornet said:
screw being fair? :smh:
The remedy for your school getting "punished financially" is found in a court of law. Not by the SWAC creating unequal scheduling, when the other 8 conference teams had nothing to do with Gram not showing up to play JSU.
Click to expand...

Let me ask. Was it fair to the other SWAC schools for JSU to get a win for a game they didn't play when GSU forfeited?
 
Kenn Rashad said:
Then you might want to address that with your president (or whoever is running ASU) because this was approved by the executive council.
Click to expand...


That would be the guy with the conkuline thats diverting all of the federal refund checks into his personal account.
 
LS Syndicate said:
I hope those punk ass players are happy now. Now they have to deal with the consequences of what really happens when you go against the university in the manner that they did. The money that Gram will pay and lose behind that deal will be passed down to them in some form or fashion, anyway.

Only difference is, three years from now, there will be no Muscle Milk donations, no money from rappers, and Doug will be in some NFL team's front office not thinking about them.
Click to expand...

They only had 7k in attendace the last 2 times JSU went to GSU.
 
J-State2DaPoint said:
He didn't read. He just piggy backed off Fiyah's comment.
Co-signing foolery.
Click to expand...
so, just because it was "approved by the executive council", everybody needs to agree lock, stock, and barrel.

btw, when Jsu was banned from the SCG, that was "approved by the executive council" too, the 9 game mandate.... "approved by the executive council".
 
jag4life said:
Exactly. Do these folks really think the presidents didn't approve this?
Click to expand...

I know that they not thinking this came from that do-nothing, M.I.A clown of a SWAC Commish. He won't even go to the bathroom without the Presidents telling him to do so. That guy is just collecting checks, being a mouthpiece for them.
 
Kenn Rashad said:
Let me ask. Was it fair to the other SWAC schools for JSU to get a win for a game they didn't play when GSU forfeited?
Click to expand...

Yeah it was fair...THEY FORFEITED. ARE YALL SERIOUS. We wouldve much much much much much rather played the game.
Are yall really this stupid?
 
Fiyah and MH,

Was it fair when SU agreed to play JSU in Jackson for those years the games where held in Jackson? How is this any different?
 



Kenn Rashad said:
Fiyah and MH,

Was it fair when SU agreed to play JSU in Jackson for those years the games where held in Jackson? How is this any different?
Click to expand...
SU can play their home game where they want to. The SWAC didn't force/tell/urge/encourage SU to move their game to Jackson. As I recall, that was a decision that SU made on where to hold their home game.
 
Kenn Rashad said:
Fiyah and MH,

Was it fair when SU agreed to play JSU in Jackson for those years the games where held in Jackson? How is this any different?
Click to expand...

The difference is simple........S.U. received monetary compensation and it was our decision and not mandated....
 
Get Ready said:
Yeah it was fair...THEY FORFEITED. ARE YALL SERIOUS. We wouldve much much much much much rather played the game.
Are yall really this stupid?
Click to expand...

Dude, I'm on your side. I'm making the point that (Fiyah and MH) can't have it both ways when it comes to "fairness".
 
mighty hornet said:
SU can play their home game where they want to. The SWAC didn't force/tell/urge/encourage SU to move their game to Jackson. As I recall, that was a decision that SU made on where to hold their home game.
Click to expand...

So you don't agree with the conference telling GSU where to play it's game for 2014 and 2016 and what to do with the funds?

The "unequal scheduling" comment threw me off.
 
mighty hornet said:
SU can play their home game where they want to. The SWAC didn't force/tell/urge/encourage SU to move their game to Jackson. As I recall, that was a decision that SU made on where to hold their home game.
Click to expand...

JROCK said:
The difference is simple........S.U. received monetary compensation and it was our decision and not mandated....
Click to expand...

Exactly, other than determining who benefits financially, what competitive advantage does this have on any OTHER team not involved in the game itself. Prairie View or Bama State are not at any kind of disadvantage by this game being played in Jackson the next 3 years.
 
Kenn Rashad said:
Exactly, other than determining who benefits financially, what competitive advantage does this have on any OTHER team not involved in the game itself. Prairie View or Bama State are not at any kind of disadvantage by this game being played in Jackson the next 3 years.
Click to expand...

I agree it doesn't adversely impact the other member schools. Too bad the SCG is only 1 week after the BC. A good solution would have been for the two meeting the week after the BC.
 
JROCK said:
I agree it doesn't adversely impact the other member schools. Too bad the SCG is only 1 week after the BC. A good solution would have been for the two meeting the week after the BC.
Click to expand...

That's dumb.

if them bastards wanted to play us they should have showed up October 19th.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top