Dr. Sweet NUPE
New Member
Is it worth it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dr. Sweet NUPE said:Is it worth it?
The NCAA D-I playoff champions the last 20+ years think it is.Dr. Sweet NUPE said:Is it worth it?
Ralph said:The NCAA D-I playoff champions the last 20+ years think it is.
Who got cheated out of a home game and who hosted and lost money? Who is "them."SU Jag 79 said:ANY champion would, but what about the 1 or 2 who got cheated out of a home game or those who hosted and STILL lost money. Think it's worth it to them?
Dude your argument is totally backwards. The way the bowl system is set up to determine the champion, that is where one game determines the champ and one team can underperform/overperform. And it's so exclusive that it limits the participants to just 2 teams. The NCAA b-ball tourney, on the other hand, is not a case of one team over/under performing for just one game. Winning one game has NEVER won any team a national championship in basketball. In today's setup, George Mason has had to "overperform" against "underperforming" teams 4 times thus far, just to make it to the Final 4. They gotta do it 2 more times. The purpose of playoffs/tourneys is to determine the best. The best teams are able to play the best for 4 or more games. The Cinderellas are usually good for one or two wins. In the case of George Mason, maybe they are just that good. Maybe they underperformed during their regular season and conference tourney. Maybe they are playing now the way they were capable of all season. Bottom line is, even though we weren't familiar with GMU, they are good.Da_Sperm said:Nope, I really don't like the idea of a playoff. I LOVE the way college football determines its champion. I mean look at basketball, George Mason could very well be the National Champion, but they couldn't even win their Mid-Major conference. They give a good argument that playoffs are worth it, but the fact is they OVERPERFORMED against teams that UNDERPERFORMED one game.
The way football is now is PERFORM every game you play. Take no game for granted. There is NO PLAYOFF. If you are one of the TOP TWO teams in the nation, then you will play for the championship. We will not give you the opportunity to get it together for a playoff.
Would it NOT been a shame for UT & USC to end of 1 & 2 at the end of the regular season last year and NOT play of the championship because they got beat in a playoff game?
Dude, basketball and football are two completely different animals. In football if your athletes are BIGGER, FASTER, and STRONGER, you will win 90% of the time. The "little guys" of college football won't have a chance like they do in basketball. What a playoff would do is give the guys who finish the season in the top 10 a legitimate chance to fight for the national championship on the field where it should be determined. The current system only allows for two teams to have a chance at the championship. That's a disgrace.Da_Sperm said:Nope, I really don't like the idea of a playoff. I LOVE the way college football determines its champion. I mean look at basketball, George Mason could very well be the National Champion, but they couldn't even win their Mid-Major conference. They give a good argument that playoffs are worth it, but the fact is they OVERPERFORMED against teams that UNDERPERFORMED one game.
The way football is now is PERFORM every game you play. Take no game for granted. There is NO PLAYOFF. If you are one of the TOP TWO teams in the nation, then you will play for the championship. We will not give you the opportunity to get it together for a playoff.
Would it NOT been a shame for UT & USC to end of 1 & 2 at the end of the regular season last year and NOT play of the championship because they got beat in a playoff game?
Ralph said:Who got cheated out of a home game and who hosted and lost money?
Not sure when JSU got cheated out of a home playoff game (can you point it out?) but the 2004 D-I national champ James Madison was the first in D-I history to win the tourney by playing all four games on the road. Thus they did not host a game and lose money.SU Jag 79 said:Jackson State in a number of cases Ralph. And didn't the champion before this past year (anyone know who that was? Shows how important it is.) later come out and say they won the title, but lost money doing it.